Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28890922›Full record

Trial reportGMS journal for medical education2017

Concept and benefits of the Inverted Classroom method for a competency-based biochemistry course in the pre-clinical stage of a human medicine course of studies.

Susanne J Kühl, Matthias Toberer, Oliver Keis, Daniel Tolks, Martin R Fischer, Michael Kühl

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in GMS journal for medical education, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Biochemistry Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic Review on Methodologies and Teaching Resources.Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Susanne J KühlUlm University, Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Ulm, Germany.
Matthias TobererUlm University, Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Ulm, Germany.
Oliver KeisUlm University, Medical Faculty Ulm, Office of Student Affairs, Ulm, Germany.
Daniel TolksClinic of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Institute of Didactics and Educational Research in Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Martin R FischerClinic of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Institute of Didactics and Educational Research in Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Michael KühlUlm University, Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Ulm, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AchievementAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelBiochemistryCohort StudiesCompetency-Based EducationComputer-Assisted InstructionCurriculumEducation, MedicalFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMotivationStudents, MedicalBiochemistrycompetency-based trainingE-Learninghuman medicineInverted ClassroomMasterplan Medizin 2020NKLM

Identifiers

PMID28890922
PMCPMC5569983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.