Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28890813›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2017

Endocuff assisted colonoscopy significantly increases sessile serrated adenoma detection in veterans.

Michael D Baek, Christian S Jackson, John Lunn, Chris Nguyen, Nicole K Shah, Steve Serrao, David Juma, Richard M Strong

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Management of Serrated Polyps of the Colon.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael D BaekLoma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Christian S JacksonLoma Linda VA Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
John LunnLoma Linda VA Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Chris NguyenLoma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Nicole K ShahLoma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Steve SerraoLoma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
David JumaLoma Linda University School of Public Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Richard M StrongLoma Linda VA Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Loma Linda University · USLoma Linda University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer related deaths in the United States. Colonoscopy is the gold standard for the detection of CRC. There are many colonoscopy quality measures and among these the adenoma detection rate (ADR) has demonstrated a significant impact in reducing mortality from CRC. The primary aim of our study was to compare ADR and distribution of polyp type in patients undergoing Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy (EAC) versus standard colonoscopy (SC) in a VA system.

methodsRetrospective data was collected from 496 patients who underwent routine screening, surveillance and diagnostic colonoscopies either via SC from January 6, 2014 through March 12, 2014 or EAC from September 24, 2014 through February 19, 2015. A total of 54 patients were excluded based on a personal history of CRC and prior resection, incomplete colonoscopy due to poor bowel preparation, and removal or loss of Endocuff (EC). Primary outcomes measured and compared were ADR and types of polyps found.

resultsThe overall ADR in the EAC group was higher at 59.91% versus 50.66% for SC, accounting for a 9% increase (P=0.0508). EAC was able to detect a total of 59 sessile serrated adenoma/polyps (SSA/Ps) compared to SC only detecting 8 (P≤0.0001). There was a significant increase in the SSA/P detection rate with EAC at 15% versus 3% in the SC group (P≤0.0001).

conclusionsEAC significantly increases the detection of SSA/P and has shown a trend in improving ADR in our veteran population.

Indexed as

adenoma detection rate (ADR)Colorectal cancer (CRC)Endocuff (EC)sessile serrated adenoma/polyps (SSA/Ps)sessile serrated adenoma (SSA)sessile serrated polyp

Identifiers

PMID28890813
PMCPMC5582040
OpenAlexW2617336358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.