ArticleSpinal cord series and cases2017
Outcome after post-acute spinal cord specific rehabilitation: a German single center study.
Article in Spinal cord series and cases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of Classes of Functioning Trajectories and Their Predictors in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury Attending Initial Rehabilitation in Switzerland.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2021Article
- Association Between SCIM III Total Scores and Individual Item Scores to Predict Independence With ADLs in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designRetrospective cohort study.
objectiveThe objective of this study was to analyze single center outcome measures of spinal cord injury (SCI)-specific rehabilitation (SCISR) in Germany.
settingThe study was conducted at an SCI specialized rehabilitation center.
methodsNonparametric tests for outcome description such as SCIM and length of stay. Logistic regression for outcome prediction was used.
resultsOne hundred and sixty patients (113 men, 47 women) with a mean age of 64.4 years were included. Non-traumatic etiologies, such as vascular diseases, tumors, infections or degenerative diseases accounted for 55.6% of SCI (89/160). Men experienced significantly more cervical lesions (
conclusionsThis is the first study giving outcomes for post-acute SCISR in Germany. The obtained data support that even in an older cohort, early admission to SCISR after SCI and longer LOSreha increases the chance for higher independence at the end of the rehabilitation period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.