ArticleGynecological surgery2017
Effects of salpingectomy during abdominal hysterectomy on ovarian reserve: a randomized controlled trial.
Article in Gynecological surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy versus hysterectomy alone.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Effect of opportunistic salpingectomy at hysterectomy on anti-Müllerian hormone: A substudy of a randomized trial.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026Trial
- The Impact of Bilateral Salpingectomy on Ovarian Reserve: A Prospective Analysis of Hormonal, Ultrasound and Clinical Correlations.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Impact of Opportunistic Salpingectomy on Ovarian Reserve: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Prevention of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2023Review
- A Study to Evaluate the Effect of Opportunistic Salpingectomy on Ovarian Reserve and Function.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2023Article
- Breast Cancer Risk Factors and Circulating Anti-Müllerian Hormone Concentration in Healthy Premenopausal Women.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2021Article
- Survey of pelvic reconstructive surgeons on performance of opportunistic salpingectomy at the time of pelvic organ prolapse repair.International urogynecology journal · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate the effect of salpingectomy on ovarian function by measuring AMH.
methodsThis study was a balanced, single-center, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial in Ruin Tan Arash Hospital, Tehran, between May 2013 and November 2014. A total of 30 patients undergoing elective abdominal hysterectomy were randomized into two groups, 15 with salpingectomy and 15 without salpingectomy. The primary objective of this study was to compare mean difference of anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) between two groups. The secondary outcomes measured were follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), operative time, and blood loss.
resultsSerum AMH levels decreased at 3 months after hysterectomy in all patients (pre AMH 1.32 ± (0.91); post AMH 1.05 ± (0.88),
conclusionsSalpingectomy with abdominal hysterectomy is a safe treatment that does not have a deleterious effect on ovarian reserve.
trial registrationIranian Registry of Clinical Trials, IRCT2014123118866N4 (www.IRCT.ir).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.