Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28890676›Full record

ArticleGynecological surgery2017

The effect of music in gynaecological office procedures on pain, anxiety and satisfaction: a randomized controlled trial.

N Mak, I M A Reinders, S A Slockers, E H M N Westen, J W M Maas, M Y Bongers

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecological surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04232930 (The Use of Music in Reducing Pain During Outpatient Hysteroscopy), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04232930 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

The Use of Music in Reducing Pain During Outpatient Hysteroscopy: Prospective Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPamela Youde Nethersole Eastern HospitalRan2019 to 2019Enrolled107ConditionsHysteroscopyArmsMusic
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

N MakDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
I M A ReindersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, The Netherlands.
S A SlockersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
E H M N WestenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rode Kruis Hospital, Beverwijk, The Netherlands.
J W M MaasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
M Y BongersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLMáxima Medisch Centrum · NLRode Kruis Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPain can interfere with office procedures in gynaecology. The aim of this study is to measure the positive effect of music in gynaecological office procedures.

methodsA randomized controlled trial was performed between October 2014 and January 2016. Women scheduled for an office hysteroscopy or colposcopy were eligible for randomization in the music group or control group. Stratification for hysteroscopy and colposcopy took place. The primary outcome is patients' level of pain during the procedure measured by the visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes include patients' level of pain after the procedure, anxiety and satisfaction of patient and doctor.

resultsNo positive effect of music on patients' perception of pain during the procedure was measured, neither for the hysteroscopy group (57 mm vs. 52 mm) nor for the colposcopy group (32 mm vs. 32 mm). Secondary outcomes were also similar for both groups.

conclusionsThis study showed no positive effect of music on patients' level of pain, anxiety or satisfaction of patient or doctor for office hysteroscopy and colposcopy. We believe a multimodal approach has to be used to decrease patient distress in terms of pain and anxiety, with or without music.

trial registrationDutch Trial Register, NTR4924.

Indexed as

AnxietyColposcopyHysteroscopyMusicOffice proceduresPain

Identifiers

PMID28890676
PMCPMC5570770
OpenAlexW2743026921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.