ArticleGynecological surgery2017
Treating symptomatic uterine fibroids with myomectomy: current practice and views of UK consultants.
Article in Gynecological surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05806307 (Comparing the Effectiveness of Misoprostol, Oxytocin, Carbetocin, Vasopressin, Bupivacaine and Epinephrine, Combined IV TXA Acid and Ethamsylate and Peri Cervical Tourniquet for the Reduction of Blood Loss During of Abdominal Myomectomy.), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparing the Effectiveness of Misoprostol, Oxytocin, Carbetocin, Vasopressin, Bupivacaine and Epinephrine, Combined IV TXA Acid and Ethamsylate and Peri Cervical Tourniquet for the Reduction of Blood Loss During of Abdominal Myomectomy.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Symptoms and Health Quality After Laparoscopic and Robotic Myomectomy.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsTrial
- The Fibroid Removal in Sterility Treatment ''FIRST'' Survey: A European Society of Gynecology Online Questionnaire.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Opportunities for change and levelling up: a trust wide retrospective analysis of 8 years of laparoscopic and abdominal myomectomy.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2024Article
- Beyond the learning curve: improving outcomes in Robotic myomectomy compared to laparoscopic myomectomy.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Article
- Robotic Myomectomy: Five Modifications in Our Practice.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2022Review
- Treating symptomatic uterine fibroids with myomectomy: current practice and views of UK consultants.Gynecological surgery · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe demand for uterus-sparing treatments is increasing as more women postpone childbirth to their 30-40s, when fibroids are more symptomatic. With an increasing choice of treatment options and changing care-provider profiles, now is an opportune time to survey current practices and opinions. Using a 25-stem questionnaire, a web-based survey was used to capture the practices and opinions of UK consultant gynecologists on the treatment of symptomatic fibroids, including the types of procedure most frequently used, methods used to reduce blood loss, and awareness and acceptability of treatment options, and to assess the impact of gender and experience of the treating gynecologist.
resultsThe response rate was 22%. Laparascopic myomectomy is used least frequently, with 80% of the respondents using GnRHa preoperatively to minimize blood loss and correct anemia, while vasopressin is most frequently used to reduce intraoperative blood loss. Female consultants operate significantly less frequently than males. Those with more than 10 years consultant experience are more likely to perform an open myomectomy compared to those with less than 10 years experience.
conclusionsCompared to a similar survey performed 10 years ago, surgical methods remain to be the most common treatments, but use of less invasive treatments such as UAE has increased. Consultants' attitudes appear to be responding to the patient demand for less radical treatments. However, it is yet to be seen if the changing consultant demographics will keep up with this demand. The low response rate warrants cautious interpretation of the results, but they provide an interesting snapshot of current views and practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.