ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2017
A cohort evaluation of clinical use and performance characteristics of Ambu
Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04045899 ("A Randomized Controlled Study Comparing ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway, Air-Q LMA and Ambu AuraGain in Mechanically Ventilated Patients"), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
"A Randomized Controlled Study Comparing ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway, Air-Q LMA and Ambu AuraGain in Mechanically Ventilated Patients"
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of clinical performance of Baska mask and Ambu AuraGain in patients undergoing surgery: A single-blinded, randomised comparative trial.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2023Article
- Article
- A new second-generation supraglottic airway device (AmbuIndian journal of anaesthesia · 2019Article
- Comparision of Ambu AuraGain™ and LMAIndian journal of anaesthesia · 2018Article
- Direct and indirect low skill fibre-optic intubation: A randomised crossover manikin study of six supraglottic airway devices.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2018Article
- Difficult airway: Challenges, phobias and options.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2017Article
- Comparison of Brimacombe score and first-attempt success rate of intubation through Ambu AuraGain and i-gel in anaesthetized adult patients: A prospective open-label study.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacologyArticle
- A study to compare Air-Q intubating laryngeal airway with Ambu Auragain laryngeal mask for blind tracheal intubation using Parker flex tip tube.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacologyArticle
- Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure and insertion characteristics of Ambu AuraGain and i-gel in patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: A randomized control trial.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsAmbu
methodsOne hundred patients, aged 18-60 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II, undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia were included in the study. The ease and number of attempts for successful insertion, ease of gastric tube insertion, leak pressures, fibre-optic grade of view, number of attempts and time for tracheal intubation, time for AG removal and complications were recorded. The mean, standard deviation (SD), interquartile range (IQR) and range were calculated. The upper limit of confidence interval for overall failure rate was calculated using Wilson's score method.
resultsAG was successfully inserted in all patients. The mean (SD) time taken for insertion was 17.32 (8.48) s. The median [IQR] leak pressures were 24 [20-28] cm of H
conclusionAMBU
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.