ArticleNeuroImage2018
Bayesian population receptive field modelling.
Article in NeuroImage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed.
- Uncertainty in population receptive field estimates revealed by variational qPRF.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2026Article
- Quantification of planar cortical magnification with optimal transport and topological smoothing.NeuroImage · 2026Article
- Human retinotopic mapping: From empirical to computational models of retinotopy.Journal of vision · 2025Review
- Quantification of retinotopic maps with a Gaussian process modeling.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- qPRF: A system to accelerate population receptive field modeling.NeuroImage · 2025Article
- Improving the reliability and accuracy of population receptive field measures using a logarithmically warped stimulus.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Searchlight-based trial-wise fMRI decoding in the presence of trial-by-trial correlations.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- qPRF: A system to accelerate population receptive field decoding.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Improving the Reliability and Accuracy of Population Receptive Field Measures Using a Logarithmically Warped Stimulus.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- A primer on Variational Laplace (VL).NeuroImage · 2023Article
- The 3D Structural Architecture of the Human Hand Area Is Nontopographic.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Characterizing visual cortical magnification with topological smoothing and optimal transportation.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2023Article
- Ramp-shaped neural tuning supports graded population-level representation of the object-to-scene continuum.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- fMRI Brain Decoding and Its Applications in Brain-Computer Interface: A Survey.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Quantitative characterization of the human retinotopic map based on quasiconformal mapping.Medical image analysis · 2022Article
- Cross-dataset reproducibility of human retinotopic maps.NeuroImage · 2021Article
- Population receptive fields of human primary visual cortex organised as DC-balanced bandpass filters.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Divisive normalization unifies disparate response signatures throughout the human visual hierarchy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Article
- Topology-preserving smoothing of retinotopic maps.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We introduce a probabilistic (Bayesian) framework and associated software toolbox for mapping population receptive fields (pRFs) based on fMRI data. This generic approach is intended to work with stimuli of any dimension and is demonstrated and validated in the context of 2D retinotopic mapping. The framework enables the experimenter to specify generative (encoding) models of fMRI timeseries, in which experimental stimuli enter a pRF model of neural activity, which in turns drives a nonlinear model of neurovascular coupling and Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) response. The neuronal and haemodynamic parameters are estimated together on a voxel-by-voxel or region-of-interest basis using a Bayesian estimation algorithm (variational Laplace). This offers several novel contributions to receptive field modelling. The variance/covariance of parameters are estimated, enabling receptive fields to be plotted while properly representing uncertainty about pRF size and location. Variability in the haemodynamic response across the brain is accounted for. Furthermore, the framework introduces formal hypothesis testing to pRF analysis, enabling competing models to be evaluated based on their log model evidence (approximated by the variational free energy), which represents the optimal tradeoff between accuracy and complexity. Using simulations and empirical data, we found that parameters typically used to represent pRF size and neuronal scaling are strongly correlated, which is taken into account by the Bayesian methods we describe when making inferences. We used the framework to compare the evidence for six variants of pRF model using 7 T functional MRI data and we found a circular Difference of Gaussians (DoG) model to be the best explanation for our data overall. We hope this framework will prove useful for mapping stimulus spaces with any number of dimensions onto the anatomy of the brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.