Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28890416›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2018

Bayesian population receptive field modelling.

Peter Zeidman, Edward Harry Silson, Dietrich Samuel Schwarzkopf, Chris Ian Baker, Will Penny

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. qPRF: A system to accelerate population receptive field decoding.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The 3D Structural Architecture of the Human Hand Area Is Nontopographic.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  12. Characterizing visual cortical magnification with topological smoothing and optimal transportation.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Divisive normalization unifies disparate response signatures throughout the human visual hierarchy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Topology-preserving smoothing of retinotopic maps.PLoS computational biology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Peter ZeidmanThe Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK. Electronic address: peter.zeidman@ucl.ac.uk.
Edward Harry SilsonLaboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892-1366, USA.
Dietrich Samuel SchwarzkopfExperimental Psychology, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AP, UK; UCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17-19 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3AR, UK.
Chris Ian BakerLaboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892-1366, USA.
Will PennyThe Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK.

Funding

Object, face, body and scene representations in the human brainZIAMH002909 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI BAKER, CHRIS · 2009 to 2025
$25.5M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We introduce a probabilistic (Bayesian) framework and associated software toolbox for mapping population receptive fields (pRFs) based on fMRI data. This generic approach is intended to work with stimuli of any dimension and is demonstrated and validated in the context of 2D retinotopic mapping. The framework enables the experimenter to specify generative (encoding) models of fMRI timeseries, in which experimental stimuli enter a pRF model of neural activity, which in turns drives a nonlinear model of neurovascular coupling and Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) response. The neuronal and haemodynamic parameters are estimated together on a voxel-by-voxel or region-of-interest basis using a Bayesian estimation algorithm (variational Laplace). This offers several novel contributions to receptive field modelling. The variance/covariance of parameters are estimated, enabling receptive fields to be plotted while properly representing uncertainty about pRF size and location. Variability in the haemodynamic response across the brain is accounted for. Furthermore, the framework introduces formal hypothesis testing to pRF analysis, enabling competing models to be evaluated based on their log model evidence (approximated by the variational free energy), which represents the optimal tradeoff between accuracy and complexity. Using simulations and empirical data, we found that parameters typically used to represent pRF size and neuronal scaling are strongly correlated, which is taken into account by the Bayesian methods we describe when making inferences. We used the framework to compare the evidence for six variants of pRF model using 7 T functional MRI data and we found a circular Difference of Gaussians (DoG) model to be the best explanation for our data overall. We hope this framework will prove useful for mapping stimulus spaces with any number of dimensions onto the anatomy of the brain.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBayes TheoremModels, NeurologicalBrainBrain MappingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingBayesianMappingModellingPopulation receptive fieldpRFRetinotopy

Identifiers

PMID28890416
PMCPMC7417811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.