Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28890280›Full record

ArticleGeneral hospital psychiatry

Psychometric properties of a short form of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D-10) scale for screening depressive symptoms in healthy community dwelling older adults.

Mohammadreza Mohebbi, Van Nguyen, John J McNeil, Robyn L Woods, Mark R Nelson, Raj C Shah, Elsdon Storey, Anne M Murray, Christopher M Reid, Brenda Kirpach and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in General hospital psychiatry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 132 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
132citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

132 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 253 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Evaluating the Impact of the Prime Time Sister CirclesJournal of general internal medicine · 2023
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

72 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohammadreza MohebbiDeakin University, Biostatistics Unit, Geelong, Australia; Deakin University, School of Medicine, IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia. Electronic address: m.mohebbi@deakin.edu.au.
Van NguyenDeakin University, Biostatistics Unit, Geelong, Australia; Deakin University, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Geelong, Australia.
John J McNeilDepartment of Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Robyn L WoodsDepartment of Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Mark R NelsonMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Raj C ShahDepartment of Family Medicine and Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States.
Elsdon StoreyDepartment of Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Anne M MurrayBerman Center for Outcomes and Clinical Research, Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, United States; Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center and University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Christopher M ReidDepartment of Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Brenda KirpachBerman Center for Outcomes and Clinical Research, Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Rory WolfeDepartment of Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Jessica E LockeryDepartment of Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Michael BerkDeakin University, School of Medicine, IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia; Department of Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Orygen, the National Centre of Excellence in Youth Health, the Department of Psychiatry and the Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Australia.
ASPREE Investigator Group
Monash University · AUBarwon Health · AUCurtin University · AUDeakin University · AUHennepin County Medical Center · USRush University Medical Center · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Tasmania · AU

Funding

ASPirin in Reducing Events in the ElderlyU01AG029824 · NIA · HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI MCNEIL, JOHN JAMES, MURRAY, ANNE M · 2009 to 2018
$64.6M
NIA NIH HHS U01 AG029824
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 10-item Center for the Epidemiological Studies of Depression Short Form (CES-D-10) is a widely used self-report measure of depression symptomatology. The aim of this study is to investigate the psychometric properties of the CES-D-10 in healthy community dwelling older adults.

methodsThe sample consists of 19,114 community-based individuals residing in Australia and the United States who participated in the ASPREE trial baseline assessment. All individuals were free of any major illness at the time. We evaluated construct validity by performing confirmatory factor analysis, examined measurement invariance across country and gender followed by evaluating item discrimination bias in age, gender, race, ethnicity and education level, and assessing internal consistency.

resultsHigh item-total correlations and Cronbach's alpha indicated high internal consistency. The factor analyses suggested a unidimensional factor structure. Construct validity was supported in the overall sample, and by country and gender sub-groups. The CES-D-10 was invariant across countries, and although evidence of marginal gender non-invariance was observed there was no evidence of notable gender specific item discrimination bias. No notable differences in discrimination parameters or group membership measurement non-invariance were detected by gender, age, race, ethnicity, and education level.

conclusionThese findings suggest the CES-D-10 is a reliable and valid measure of depression in a volunteer sample. No noteworthy evidence of invariance and/or item discrimination bias is observed across gender, age, race, language and ethnic groups.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaDepressionDepressive DisorderFemaleHumansIndependent LivingMalePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsUnited StatesCES-D-10DepressionGeriatricMedicinePsychiatryPsychometricsScale validation

Identifiers

PMID28890280
PMCPMC6178798
OpenAlexW2747198989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.