Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28889979›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2017

Visual Threat Assessment and Reticulospinal Encoding of Calibrated Responses in Larval Zebrafish.

Kiran Bhattacharyya, David L McLean, Malcolm A MacIver

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Whole-body central processing of lateral line inputs encodes flow direction relative to the center-of-mass.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Eat, flee, freeze: Division of labor in the larval zebrafish visuomotor system.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Spinal Basis of Direction Control during Locomotion in Larval Zebrafish.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  16. Wild animals suppress the spread of socially transmitted misinformation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kiran BhattacharyyaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.
David L McLeanDepartment of Neurobiology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.
Malcolm A MacIverDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA; Department of Neurobiology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA; Department of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA. Electronic address: maciver@northwestern.edu.

Funding

Functional Development of Motor NetworksR01NS067299 · NINDS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI MCLEAN, DAVID · 2010 to 2019
$4.0M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS067299
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All visual animals must decide whether approaching objects are a threat. Our current understanding of this process has identified a proximity-based mechanism where an evasive maneuver is triggered when a looming stimulus passes a subtended visual angle threshold. However, some escape strategies are more costly than others, and so it would be beneficial to additionally encode the level of threat conveyed by the predator's approach rate to select the most appropriate response. Here, using naturalistic rates of looming visual stimuli while simultaneously monitoring escape behavior and the recruitment of multiple reticulospinal neurons, we find that larval zebrafish do indeed perform a calibrated assessment of threat. While all fish generate evasive maneuvers at the same subtended visual angle, lower approach rates evoke slower, more kinematically variable escape responses with relatively long latencies as well as the unilateral recruitment of ventral spinal projecting nuclei (vSPNs) implicated in turning. In contrast, higher approach rates evoke faster, more kinematically stereotyped responses with relatively short latencies, as well as bilateral recruitment of vSPNs and unilateral recruitment of giant fiber neurons in fish and amphibians called Mauthner cells. In addition to the higher proportion of more costly, shorter-latency Mauthner-active responses to greater perceived threats, we observe a higher incidence of freezing behavior at higher approach rates. Our results provide a new framework to understand how behavioral flexibility is grounded in the appropriate balancing of trade-offs between fast and slow movements when deciding to respond to a visually perceived threat.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaEscape ReactionNeuronsReaction TimeVisual PerceptionZebrafishbehavioral variabilitycalcium imagingescape behaviorescape strategygiant fiberhindbrainlightfield microscopylooming stimulusMauthner cell

Identifiers

PMID28889979
PMCPMC5703209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.