Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28889366›Full record

ReviewCurrent urology reports2017

Performance of

Jason Bailey, Morand Piert

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current urology reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Deep neural network for automatic characterization of lesions onEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020
    Article
  10. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. La Radiologia medica · 2018
    Review
  13. Clinical implications of PET/CT in prostate cancer management.Translational andrology and urology · 2018
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jason BaileyDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Morand PiertDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. mpiert@umich.edu.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of the reviewRecently introduced Gallium-68 labeled PSMA-ligands such as HBED-CC ( RECENT

findings

Indexed as

RadiopharmaceuticalsEdetic AcidHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPositron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsEdetic AcidN,N'-bis(2-hydroxy-5-(ethylene-beta-carboxy)benzyl)ethylenediamine N,N'-diacetic acidProstate-Specific AntigenRadiopharmaceuticals68Ga-PSMA-1168Ga-PSMA-HBED-CCPET/CTProstate cancerProstate-specific membrane antigenPSMA

Identifiers

PMID28889366
OpenAlexW2754366791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.