Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28889354›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2018

Predictive value of SYNTAX score II for clinical outcomes in cardiogenic shock underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention; a pilot study.

Mert İlker Hayıroğlu, Muhammed Keskin, Ahmet Okan Uzun, Emrah Bozbeyoğlu, Özlem Yıldırımtürk, Ömer Kozan, Seçkin Pehlivanoğlu

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Comparison of coronary artery disease involvement in patients with or without familial history.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mert İlker HayıroğluDepartment of Cardiology, Haydarpasa Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, 34668, Kadikoy, Istanbul, Turkey. mertilkerh@yahoo.com.
Muhammed KeskinDepartment of Cardiology, Haydarpasa Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, 34668, Kadikoy, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ahmet Okan UzunDepartment of Cardiology, Hatay Dortyol State Hospital, Hatay, Turkey.
Emrah BozbeyoğluDepartment of Cardiology, Dr. Siyami Ersek Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Özlem YıldırımtürkDepartment of Cardiology, Dr. Siyami Ersek Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ömer KozanDepartment of Cardiology, Haydarpasa Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, 34668, Kadikoy, Istanbul, Turkey.
Seçkin PehlivanoğluDepartment of Cardiology, Başkent University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRDr. Siyami Ersek Göğüs Kalp Ve Damar Cerrahisi Eğitim Ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRBaşkent University · TRBayburt State Hospital · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SYNTAX Score II (SSII) connects clinical variables with coronary anatomy. We investigated the prognostic value of SSII in patients with ST segment elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) complicated with cardiogenic shock treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). In this retrospective analysis, we evaluated the in-hospital prognostic impact of SSII on 492 patients with STEMI complicated with cardiogenic shock treated with PPCI. Patients were stratified by tertiles of SSII, in-hospital clinical outcomes were compared between those groups. In-hospital univariate analysis revealed higher rates of in-hospital death for patients with SSII in tertile 3, as compared to patients with SSII in tertile 1 (OR 17.4, 95% CI 10.0-30.2, p < 0.001). After adjustment for confounding baseline variables, SSII in tertile 3 was associated with 6.2-fold hazard of in-hospital death (OR 6.2, 95% CI 2.6-14.1, p < 0.001). SSII in patients with STEMI complicated with cardiogenic shock treated with PPCI provide an independent prognostic marker of in-hospital outcomes. Our data suggests SSII to be a simple, feasible and clinically applicable tool for rapid risk stratification in patients with STEMI complicated with cardiogenic shock treated with PPCI.

Indexed as

Coronary AngiographyDecision Support TechniquesPercutaneous Coronary InterventionAgedAged, 80 and overArea Under CurveChi-Square DistributionEchocardiographyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHospital MortalityHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioCardiogenic shockPercutaneous coronary interventionSYNTAX score II

Identifiers

PMID28889354
OpenAlexW2755784419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.