ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2018
The Work Role Functioning Questionnaire v2.0 Showed Consistent Factor Structure Across Six Working Samples.
Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The need to consider return to work as a main outcome in patients undergoing surgery for diffuse low-grade glioma: a systematic review.Acta neurochirurgica · 2022Pooled it
- The effect of home exercises with kinesiotaping on pain, functionality, and work performance in bus drivers with non-specific neck pain.Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation · 2024Trial
- Assessing Functional Limitations in Workers with a Common Mental Disorder or a Musculoskeletal Disorder: A Scoping Review of Questionnaires.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Trajectory and Predictors of Return-to-Work Outcomes for People After a Road Traffic Injury: A Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Functional impact of long COVID among healthcare workers with comorbidities in Quebec, Canada: a cross-sectional study.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Feasibility and acceptability of a self-management intervention supporting return to work for women with breast cancer.The British journal of occupational therapy · 2025Article
- Vulnerability profiles of workers and the relation with burnout symptoms: results from the Netherlands working conditions survey.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2024Article
- Employment barriers questionnaire: Development and determination of its reliability and validity.Work (Reading, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Work-related outcomes in individuals with and without lower limb osteoarthritis: an online survey.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Article
- Work functioning among young adults: the role of mental health problems from childhood to young adulthood.Occupational and environmental medicine · 2022Article
- Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Work Role Functioning Questionnaire 2.0 into Brazilian Portuguese in a general population.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2022Observational
- Article
- Validation of the Work Role Functioning Questionnaire 2.0 in cancer patients.European journal of cancer care · 2021Article
- Early intervention, treatment and rehabilitation of employees with common mental disorders by using psychotherapeutic consultation at work: study protocol of a randomised controlled multicentre trial (friaa project).BMC public health · 2021Article
- Development of employment indicators to advance the quality of spinal cord injury rehabilitation care: SCI-High Project.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2021Article
- Development and Construct Validity of the Work Instability Scale for People With Common Mental Disorders in a Sample of Depressed and Anxious Workers: A Rasch Analysis.Rehabilitation process and outcome · 2020Article
- Reliability and Validity of the Work and Well-Being Inventory (WBI) for Self-Employed Workers: Test Norms of Employees Are Not Suitable for Entrepreneurs.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2019Article
- Work disability and its determinants in patients with pituitary tumor-related disease.Pituitary · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective The Work Role Functioning Questionnaire v2.0 (WRFQ) is an outcome measure linking a persons' health to the ability to meet work demands in the twenty-first century. We aimed to examine the construct validity of the WRFQ in a heterogeneous set of working samples in the Netherlands with mixed clinical conditions and job types to evaluate the comparability of the scale structure. Methods Confirmatory factor and multi-group analyses were conducted in six cross-sectional working samples (total N = 2433) to evaluate and compare a five-factor model structure of the WRFQ (work scheduling demands, output demands, physical demands, mental and social demands, and flexibility demands). Model fit indices were calculated based on RMSEA ≤ 0.08 and CFI ≥ 0.95. After fitting the five-factor model, the multidimensional structure of the instrument was evaluated across samples using a second order factor model. Results The factor structure was robust across samples and a multi-group model had adequate fit (RMSEA = 0.63, CFI = 0.972). In sample specific analyses, minor modifications were necessary in three samples (final RMSEA 0.055-0.080, final CFI between 0.955 and 0.989). Applying the previous first order specifications, a second order factor model had adequate fit in all samples. Conclusion A five-factor model of the WRFQ showed consistent structural validity across samples. A second order factor model showed adequate fit, but the second order factor loadings varied across samples. Therefore subscale scores are recommended to compare across different clinical and working samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.