Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28889082›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology2017

Comparison of three multiplex gastrointestinal platforms for the detection of gastroenteritis viruses.

Preeti Chhabra, Nicole Gregoricus, Geoffrey A Weinberg, Natasha Halasa, James Chappell, Ferdaus Hassan, Rangaraj Selvarangan, Slavica Mijatovic-Rustempasic, M Leanne Ward, Michael Bowen and 2 more

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Evaluation of false positive enteric viruses results from the BIOFIRE® FILMARRAY® gastrointestinal PCR panel.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Clinical Performance of the LiquidArrayDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The Impact of a Positive BiofireDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Incidence of enterovirus in patients with acute gastroenteritis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Detection and evaluation of rotavirus surveillance methods as viral indicator in the aquatic environments.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Preeti ChhabraSynergy America, Inc., Atlanta, GA, United States; Division of Viral Diseases, National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Disease, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Nicole GregoricusDivision of Viral Diseases, National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Disease, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Geoffrey A WeinbergUniversity of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Golisano Children's Hospital, Rochester, NY, United States.
Natasha HalasaDepartment of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt Vaccine Research Program, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
James ChappellDepartment of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt Vaccine Research Program, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
Ferdaus HassanDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospitals, Kansas City, MO, United States.
Rangaraj SelvaranganDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospitals, Kansas City, MO, United States.
Slavica Mijatovic-RustempasicDivision of Viral Diseases, National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Disease, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
M Leanne WardDivision of Viral Diseases, National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Disease, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Michael BowenDivision of Viral Diseases, National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Disease, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Daniel C PayneDivision of Viral Diseases, National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Disease, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Jan VinjéDivision of Viral Diseases, National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Disease, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States. Electronic address: jvinje@cdc.gov.

Funding

Enhanced Surveillance for Newly Preventable Diseases (ARI and AGE Surveillance) - Rochester, NYU01IP001049 · IP · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI WEINBERG, GEOFFREY ALAN · 2016 to 2020
$6.3M
Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NCIRD CDC HHS U01 IP001049NCIRD CDC HHS U01 IP001063
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundViruses are major etiological agents of childhood gastroenteritis. In recent years, several molecular platforms for the detection of viral enteric pathogens have become available. OBJECTIVE/STUDY

designWe evaluated the performance of three multiplex platforms including Biofire's Gastrointestinal Panel (FilmArray), Luminex xTAG

resultsThe FilmArray detected a virus in 199 (96.1%) and the TAC in 172 (83.1%) of the 207 samples (187 samples positive for a single virus and 20 samples positive for more than one virus) whereas the GPP detected a virus in 100 (78.7%) of the 127 (97 positive for one virus and three positive for more than one virus) samples. Overall the clinical accuracy was highest for the FilmArray (98%) followed by TAC (97.2%) and GPP (96.9%). The sensitivity of the FilmArray, GPP and TAC platforms was highest for rotavirus (100%, 95.8%, and 89.6%, respectively) and lowest for adenovirus type 40/41 (97.4%, 57.9% and 68.4%). The specificity of the three platforms ranged from 95.6% (rotavirus) to 99.6% (norovirus/sapovirus) for the FilmArray, 99.6% (norovirus) to 100% (rotavirus/adenovirus) for GPP, and 98.9% (astrovirus) to 100% (rotavirus/sapovirus) for TAC.

conclusionThe FilmArray demonstrated the best analytical performance followed by TAC. In recent years, the availability of multi-enteric molecular testing platforms has increased significantly and our data highlight the strengths and weaknesses of these platforms.

Indexed as

FecesGastroenteritisHumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionNorovirusRotavirusSapovirusSensitivity and SpecificityVirus DiseasesAdenovirus type 40/41AstrovirusGastroenteritis virusesNorovirusRotavirusSapovirus

Identifiers

PMID28889082
PMCPMC5940486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.