Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28888972›Full record

ArticleJournal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology2017

EMG synchrony to assess impaired corticomotor control of locomotion after stroke.

Neha Lodha, Yen-Ting Chen, Theresa E McGuirk, Emily J Fox, Steven A Kautz, Evangelos A Christou, David J Clark

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Neurophysiology of cerebellar ataxias and gait disorders.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Neha LodhaDepartment of Health and Exercise Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Yen-Ting ChenHealth Science Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA.
Theresa E McGuirkBrain Rehabilitation Research Center, Malcom Randall VA Medical Center, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Emily J FoxDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Brooks Rehabilitation, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Steven A KautzRalph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC, USA; Department of Health Sciences and Research and Division of Physical Therapy, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Evangelos A ChristouDepartment of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
David J ClarkBrain Rehabilitation Research Center, Malcom Randall VA Medical Center, Gainesville, FL, USA; Department of Aging and Geriatric Research, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. Electronic address: davidclark@ufl.edu.
University of Florida · USColorado State University · USMalcom Randall VA Medical Center · USMedical University of South Carolina · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · US

Funding

Treating Depression and Enhancing Locomotor Recovery Post-strokeP20GM109040 · NIGMS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI KAUTZ, STEVEN A. · 2014 to 2024
$23.5M
University of Florida Older Americans Independence Center (OAIC)P30AG028740 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI CHRISTIAAN LEEUWENBURGH · 2007 to 2026
$22.8M
Aging and learning of novel fine motor tasksR01AG031769 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI CHRISTOU, EVANGELOS A · 2008 to 2012
$1.0M
Rehabilitation of corticospinal control of walking following strokeI01RX001149 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI CLARK, DAVID J · 2015 to 2018
–
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG028740NIA NIH HHS R01 AG031769NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109040RRD VA I01 RX001149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adapting one's gait pattern requires a contribution from cortical motor commands. Evidence suggests that frequency-based analysis of electromyography (EMG) can be used to detect this cortical contribution. Specifically, increased EMG synchrony between synergistic muscles in the Piper frequency band has been linked to heightened corticomotor contribution to EMG. Stroke-related damage to cerebral motor pathways would be expected to diminish EMG Piper synchrony. The objective of this study is therefore to test the hypothesis that EMG Piper synchrony is diminished in the paretic leg relative to nonparetic and control legs, particularly during a long-step task of walking adaptability. Twenty adults with post-stroke hemiparesis and seventeen healthy controls participated in this study. EMG Piper synchrony increased more for the control legs compare to the paretic legs when taking a non-paretic long step (5.02±3.22% versus 0.86±2.62%), p<0.01) and when taking a paretic long step (2.04±1.98% versus 0.70±2.34%, p<0.05). A similar but non-significant trend was evident when comparing non-paretic and paretic legs. No statistically significant differences in EMG Piper synchrony were found between legs for typical walking. EMG Piper synchrony was positively associated with walking speed and step length within the stroke group. These findings support the assertion that EMG Piper synchrony indicates corticomotor contribution to walking.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overElectromyographyFemaleGaitHumansLocomotionMaleMiddle AgedMotor CortexMuscle, SkeletalParesisStrokeWalkingElectromyographyMotor controlNervous systemWalking

Identifiers

PMID28888972
PMCPMC5698140
OpenAlexW2751025442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.