Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28888829›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]

Sensitivity, specificity and comparison of three commercially available immunological tests in the diagnosis of Cryptosporidium species in animals.

Olga Danišová, Monika Halánová, Alexandra Valenčáková, Lenka Luptáková

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Diagnosis and control of cryptosporidiosis in farm animals.Journal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Annals of Saudi medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Olga DanišováUniversity of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Biology and Genetics, Košice, Slovakia.
Monika HalánováPavol Jozef Šafárik University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology, Košice, Slovakia. Electronic address: monika.halanova@upjs.sk.
Alexandra ValenčákováUniversity of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Biology and Genetics, Košice, Slovakia.
Lenka LuptákováUniversity of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Biology and Genetics, Košice, Slovakia.
University of Veterinary Medicine in Košice · SKUniversity of Pavol Jozef Šafárik · SK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study was conducted to compare the specificity of immunological diagnostic methods used for the diagnosis of Cryptosporidium species capable of causing life-threatening infection in both immunosuppressed and immunocompetent patients. For the detection of Cryptosporidium species in 79 animals with diarrhoea, we used three Copro-antigen tests: RIDASCREEN

Indexed as

AnimalsCryptosporidiosisCryptosporidiumDiarrheaImmunologic TestsSensitivity and SpecificityComparisonCryptosporidium spp.Genetic diversityImmunology testsPCR

Identifiers

PMID28888829
PMCPMC5790642
OpenAlexW2753144720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.