Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28888770›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance imaging2018

Test-retest reliability of cerebral blood flow in healthy individuals using arterial spin labeling: Findings from the EMBARC study.

Jorge R C Almeida, Tsafrir Greenberg, Hanzhang Lu, Henry W Chase, Jay C Fournier, Crystal M Cooper, Thilo Deckersbach, Phil Adams, Thomas Carmody, Maurizio Fava and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Depression, stress and regional cerebral blood flow.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Jorge R C AlmeidaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, RI 02906, USA; Departments of Psychiatry, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA. Electronic address: Jorge.Almeida@austin.utexas.edu.
Tsafrir GreenbergDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Hanzhang LuDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75235, USA.
Henry W ChaseDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Jay C FournierDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Crystal M CooperDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75235, USA.
Thilo DeckersbachDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Phil AdamsDepartment of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75235, USA.
Thomas CarmodyDepartment of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75235, USA.
Maurizio FavaDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Benji KurianDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75235, USA.
Patrick J McGrathDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and the New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Melvin G McInnisDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Maria A OquendoDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-3309, USA.
Ramin ParseyDepartments of Psychiatry & Radiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.
Myrna WeissmanDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and the New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Madhukar TrivediDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75235, USA.
Mary L PhillipsDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.

Funding

Establishing Moderators/Biosignatures of Antidepressant Response- Clinical CareU01MH092221 · NIMH · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TRIVEDI, MADHUKAR H. · 2010 to 2015
$9.7M
Biosignatures of Treatment Remission in Major DepressionU01MH092250 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MCGRATH, PATRICK J, PARSEY, RAMIN V. · 2010 to 2015
$8.9M
Neural Markers of Individual Difference in Emotion Regulation in Depressed AdultsK23MH097889 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FOURNIER, JAY C · 2013 to 2017
$786k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH097889NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH092221NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH092250
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPrevious investigations of test-retest reliability of cerebral blood flow (CBF) at rest measured with pseudo-continuous Arterial Spin Labeling (pCASL) demonstrated good reliability, but are limited by the use of similar scanner platforms. In the present study we examined test-retest reliability of CBF in regions implicated in emotion and the default mode network. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe measured absolute and relative CBF at rest in thirty-one healthy subjects in two scan sessions, one week apart, at four different sites and three different scan platforms. We derived CBF from pCASL images with an automated algorithm and calculated intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) across sessions for regions of interest. In addition, we investigated site effects.

resultsFor both absolute and relative CBF measures, ICCs were good to excellent (i.e. >0.6) in most brain regions, with highest values observed for the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex and ventral striatum. A leave-one-site-out cross validation analysis did not show a significant effect for site on whole brain CBF and there was no proportional bias across sites. However, a significant site effect was present in the repeated measures ANOVA.

conclusionsThe high test-retest reliability of CBF measured with pCASL in a range of brain regions implicated in emotion and salience processing, emotion regulation, and the default mode network, which have been previously linked to depression symptomatology supports its use in studies that aim to identify neuroimaging biomarkers of treatment response.

Indexed as

AdultAlgorithmsBrainCerebrovascular CirculationFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedReference ValuesReproducibility of ResultsRestSpin LabelsSpin LabelsArterial spin labelingCerebral blood flowfMRIReliability

Identifiers

PMID28888770
PMCPMC5743013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.