Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28888227›Full record

ArticleBMC biotechnology2017

Conversion of an inactive xylose isomerase into a functional enzyme by co-expression of GroEL-GroES chaperonins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Beatriz Temer, Leandro Vieira Dos Santos, Victor Augusti Negri, Juliana Pimentel Galhardo, Pedro Henrique Mello Magalhães, Juliana José, Cidnei Marschalk, Thamy Lívia Ribeiro Corrêa, Marcelo Falsarella Carazzolle, Gonçalo Amarante Guimarães Pereira

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biotechnology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Systems Metabolic Engineering ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  7. FromJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  8. Engineering ofEngineering microbiology · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Beatriz TemerLaboratory of Genomics and Expression, Department of Genetics and Evolution, Institute of Biology, UNICAMP, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-970, Brazil.
Leandro Vieira Dos SantosLaboratory of Genomics and Expression, Department of Genetics and Evolution, Institute of Biology, UNICAMP, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-970, Brazil.
Victor Augusti NegriLaboratory of Genomics and Expression, Department of Genetics and Evolution, Institute of Biology, UNICAMP, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-970, Brazil.
Juliana Pimentel GalhardoLaboratory of Genomics and Expression, Department of Genetics and Evolution, Institute of Biology, UNICAMP, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-970, Brazil.
Pedro Henrique Mello MagalhãesLaboratory of Genomics and Expression, Department of Genetics and Evolution, Institute of Biology, UNICAMP, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-970, Brazil.
Juliana JoséLaboratory of Genomics and Expression, Department of Genetics and Evolution, Institute of Biology, UNICAMP, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-970, Brazil.
Cidnei MarschalkLaboratory of Genomics and Expression, Department of Genetics and Evolution, Institute of Biology, UNICAMP, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-970, Brazil.
Thamy Lívia Ribeiro CorrêaLaboratory of Genomics and Expression, Department of Genetics and Evolution, Institute of Biology, UNICAMP, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-970, Brazil.
Marcelo Falsarella CarazzolleLaboratory of Genomics and Expression, Department of Genetics and Evolution, Institute of Biology, UNICAMP, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-970, Brazil.
Gonçalo Amarante Guimarães PereiraLaboratory of Genomics and Expression, Department of Genetics and Evolution, Institute of Biology, UNICAMP, Campinas, São Paulo, 13083-970, Brazil. goncalo@unicamp.br.
Genomic (Brazil) · BRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRBrazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSecond-generation ethanol production is a clean bioenergy source with potential to mitigate fossil fuel emissions. The engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for xylose utilization is an essential step towards the production of this biofuel. Though xylose isomerase (XI) is the key enzyme for xylose conversion, almost half of the XI genes are not functional when expressed in S. cerevisiae. To date, protein misfolding is the most plausible hypothesis to explain this phenomenon.

resultsThis study demonstrated that XI from the bacterium Propionibacterium acidipropionici becomes functional in S. cerevisiae when co-expressed with GroEL-GroES chaperonin complex from Escherichia coli. The developed strain BTY34, harboring the chaperonin complex, is able to efficiently convert xylose to ethanol with a yield of 0.44 g ethanol/g xylose. Furthermore, the BTY34 strain presents a xylose consumption rate similar to those observed for strains carrying the widely used XI from the fungus Orpinomyces sp. In addition, the tetrameric XI structure from P. acidipropionici showed an elevated number of hydrophobic amino acid residues on the surface of protein when compared to XI commonly expressed in S. cerevisiae.

conclusionsBased on our results, we elaborate an extensive discussion concerning the uncertainties that surround heterologous expression of xylose isomerases in S. cerevisiae. Probably, a correct folding promoted by GroEL-GroES could solve some issues regarding a limited or absent XI activity in S. cerevisiae. The strains developed in this work have promising industrial characteristics, and the designed strategy could be an interesting approach to overcome the non-functionality of bacterial protein expression in yeasts.

Indexed as

Aldose-Ketose IsomerasesChaperonin 60Escherichia coli ProteinsEthanolHeat-Shock ProteinsModels, MolecularPropionibacteriumProtein ConformationProtein EngineeringRecombinant ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeXyloseAldose-Ketose IsomerasesChaperonin 60Escherichia coli ProteinsEthanolGroE protein, E coliHeat-Shock ProteinsRecombinant ProteinsXylosexylose isomeraseEthanol productionGroEL-GroES chaperoninsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeXylose fermentationXylose isomerase

Identifiers

PMID28888227
PMCPMC5591498
OpenAlexW2750909614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.