Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28888101›Full record

ReviewNeoplasia (New York, N.Y.)2017

What's New in SCLC? A Review.

Bryan Oronsky, Tony R Reid, Arnold Oronsky, Corey A Carter

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05683977 (EvaluatioN of durvALumab Utilization and Effectiveness for First Line Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer. Prospective Cohort of Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Durvalumab Associated With Platinum-etoposide Chemotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 120 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
120citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05683977 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

EvaluatioN of durvALumab Utilization and Effectiveness for First Line Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer. Prospective Cohort of Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Durvalumab Associated With Platinum-etoposide Chemotherapy

TypeobservationalSponsorAstraZenecaRan2022 to 2027Enrolled254ConditionsSmall Cell Lung CarcinomaArmsdurvalumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

120 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 189 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Impact ofFrontiers in medicine · 2019
    Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

60 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bryan OronskyEpicentRx Inc, 4445 Eastgate Mall, Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92121, USA. Electronic address: boronsky@epicentrx.com.
Tony R ReidUniversity of California San Diego, Moores Cancer Center, 3855 Health Sciences Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Arnold OronskyInterWest Partners, 2710 Sand Hill Road #200, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA.
Corey A CarterWalter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Ave, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA.
University of California, San Diego · USWalter Reed National Military Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A few years ago the answer to the question in the title of this review would have been, "unfortunately not much" or even "nothing", likely eliciting knowing nods of agreement from oncologists. For the last 3 decades, SCLC has been notorious for its lack of progress, as drug after drug, over 60 of them, in fact, including inhibitors of VEGF, IGFR, mTOR, EGFR and HGF has failed and fallen by the wayside due to little or no impact on PFS or OS, while SCLC's cousin, NSCLC, has notched success after success with a spate of targeted treatment and immunotherapy regulatory approvals. However, a paradigm shift or, more appropriately, a 'paradigm nudge' is quietly underway in extensive stage SCLC with a series of agents that in early clinical trials have shown the potential to 'lift the curse' in SCLC, heretofore referred to as "a graveyard for drug development". These agents, constituting the "best of what's new" in SCLC, and discussed in this review following a brief overview of the classification, epidemiology, prognosis and current treatment of SCLC, include checkpoint inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, PARP inhibitors, epigenetic inhibitor/innate immune activator, and an inhibitor of RNA polymerase II. Compared to NSCLC, the therapeutic options are still limited but with one or more successes to build momentum and drive long-overdue R&D and clinical investment the hope is that the approval floodgates may finally open.

Indexed as

HumansImmunotherapyLung NeoplasmsMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasm StagingPrevalencePrognosisSmall Cell Lung CarcinomaTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID28888101
PMCPMC5596356
OpenAlexW2753004811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.