Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28888032›Full record

ArticleHippocampus2018

Close but no cigar: Spatial precision deficits following medial temporal lobe lesions provide novel insight into theoretical models of navigation and memory.

Branden S Kolarik, Trevor Baer, Kiarash Shahlaie, Andrew P Yonelinas, Arne D Ekstrom

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hippocampus, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Retrieval-related eye movements are predictive of memory precision.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Age differences in spatial memory are mitigated during naturalistic navigation.Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Perspective taking and systematic biases in object location memory.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Branden S KolarikDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, 95618.ORCID 0000-0003-4478-062X
Trevor BaerDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, 95618.
Kiarash ShahlaieDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California, 95817.
Andrew P YonelinasDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, 95618.
Arne D EkstromDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, 95618.
University of California, Davis · USNeurological Surgery · US

Funding

Representation of spatiotemporal information in human episodic memory and navigationR01NS076856 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI ARNE D EKSTROM · 2012 to 2026
$4.8M
Testing a Novel Theoretical Framework for the Human Medial Temporal Lobes in Perception and Memory During Spatial NavigationR03NS093052 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI EKSTROM, ARNE D · 2015 to 2016
$142k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS076856NINDS NIH HHS R03 NS093052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing evidence suggests that the human hippocampus contributes to a range of different behaviors, including episodic memory, language, short-term memory, and navigation. A novel theoretical framework, the Precision and Binding Model, accounts for these phenomenon by describing a role for the hippocampus in high-resolution, complex binding. Other theories like Cognitive Map Theory, in contrast, predict a specific role for the hippocampus in allocentric navigation, while Declarative Memory Theory predicts a specific role in delay-dependent conscious memory. Navigation provides a unique venue for testing these predictions, with past results from research with humans providing inconsistent findings regarding the role of the human hippocampus in spatial navigation. Here, we tested five patients with lesions primarily restricted to the hippocampus and those extending out into the surrounding medial temporal lobe cortex on a virtual water maze task. Consistent with the Precision and Binding Model, we found partially intact allocentric memory in all patients, with impairments in the spatial precision of their searches for a hidden target. We found similar impairments at both immediate and delayed testing. Our findings are consistent with the Precision and Binding Model of hippocampal function, arguing for its role across domains in high-resolution, complex binding. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Remembering goal locations in one's environment is a critical skill for survival. How this information is represented in the brain is still not fully understood, but is believed to rely in some capacity on structures in the medial temporal lobe. Contradictory findings from studies of both humans and animals have been difficult to reconcile with regard to the role of the MTL, specifically the hippocampus. By assessing impairments observed during navigation to a goal in patients with medial temporal lobe damage we can better understand the role these structures play in such behavior. Utilizing virtual reality and novel analysis techniques, we have more precisely assessed the impact that medial temporal lobe damage has on spatial memory and navigation.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalModels, PsychologicalAdultAmnesiaFemaleHippocampusHumansMaleMaze LearningMiddle AgedSpatial MemorySpatial NavigationTemporal LobeHippocampusLesionsMedial Temporal LobeSpatial Navigation

Identifiers

PMID28888032
PMCPMC5747326
OpenAlexW2752269289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.