Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28887835›Full record

ArticleBirth (Berkeley, Calif.)2017

Prenatal attitudes toward vaginal delivery and actual delivery mode: Variation by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status.

Laura B Attanasio, Rachel R Hardeman, Katy B Kozhimannil, Kristen H Kjerulff

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Birth (Berkeley, Calif.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Racial bias in cesarean decision-making.American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Laura B AttanasioDepartment of Health Promotion and Policy, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9294-0718
Rachel R HardemanDivision of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Katy B KozhimannilDivision of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Kristen H KjerulffDepartment of Public Health Sciences and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Penn State University, Hershey, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5376-2581
University of Minnesota · USPennsylvania State University · USUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst · US

Funding

Mode of First Delivery and Subsequent Child-BearingR01HD052990 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI KJERULFF, KRISTEN HAWTHORNE · 2008 to 2012
$3.9M
The Patient-Provider Relationship and Use of Labor Induction and Cesarean DeliveryR36HS024215 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI ATTANASIO, LAURA B · 2015 to 2015
$35k
AHRQ HHS R36 HS024215NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD052990
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesResearchers documenting persistent racial/ethnic and socioeconomic status disparities in chances of cesarean delivery have speculated that women's birth attitudes and preferences may partially explain these differences, but no studies have directly tested this hypothesis. We examined whether women's prenatal attitudes toward vaginal delivery differed by race/ethnicity or socioeconomic status, and whether attitudes were differently related to delivery mode depending on race/ethnicity or socioeconomic status.

methodsData were from the First Baby Study, a cohort of 3006 women who gave birth to a first baby in Pennsylvania between 2009 and 2011. We used regression models to examine (1) predictors of prenatal attitudes toward vaginal delivery, and (2) the association between prenatal attitudes and actual delivery mode. To assess moderation, we estimated models adding interaction terms.

resultsPrenatal attitudes toward vaginal delivery were not associated with race/ethnicity or socioeconomic status. Positive attitudes toward vaginal delivery were associated with lower odds of cesarean delivery (AOR=0.60, P < .001). However, vaginal delivery attitudes were only related to delivery mode among women who were white, highly educated, and privately insured.

conclusionsThere are racial/ethnic differences in chances of cesarean delivery, and these differences are not explained by birth attitudes. Furthermore, our findings suggest that white and high-socioeconomic status women may be more able to realize their preferences in childbirth.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePatient PreferenceSocial ClassAdolescentAdultCohort StudiesDelivery, ObstetricEthnicityFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMultivariate AnalysisPennsylvaniaPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesWhite Peoplebirth attitudescesarean deliveryhealth disparitiesmaternity carerace

Identifiers

PMID28887835
PMCPMC5687997
OpenAlexW2753839536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.