Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28887736›Full record

ArticleJournal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs2018

A comparison among three different apheretic techniques for treatment of hyperbilirubinemia.

Davide Viggiano, Emanuela de Pascale, Gaia Marinelli, Corrado Pluvio

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Extracorporeal liver support techniques: a comparison.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. [Clinical study of heparin anticoagulation scheme during plasma adsorption therapy for liver failure].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Davide ViggianoDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, 86100, Campobasso, Italy. davide.viggiano@unimol.it.
Emanuela de PascaleAORN dei Colli, D. Cotugno Hospital, Department of Dialysis with Hepatic-Infective Complications, via L. Bianchi, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Gaia MarinelliAORN dei Colli, D. Cotugno Hospital, Department of Dialysis with Hepatic-Infective Complications, via L. Bianchi, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Corrado PluvioAORN dei Colli, D. Cotugno Hospital, Department of Dialysis with Hepatic-Infective Complications, via L. Bianchi, 80131, Naples, Italy. corradopluvio@gmail.com.
Ospedale D. Cotugno · ITUniversity of Molise · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liver failure is associated to high mortality due to the accumulation of protein-bound metabolites, such as bilirubin, not removed by conventional hemodialysis. Different methods can efficiently remove them, such as the molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS), plasma exchange (PEX), and bilirubin or plasma adsorption perfusion (PAP). No direct comparison exists between MARS, PEX and PAP, and current guidelines do not specify which method (and when) to use. We have retrospectively evaluated MARS, PEX and PAP in their effectiveness in lowering plasma bilirubin concentration, and their effects on liver and kidney function. A total of 98 patients have been recruited, which comprised 68 patients treated with PAP (177 sessions), 16 patients with PEX (41 sessions) and 11 patients with MARS (21 sessions). Bilirubin, creatinine, liver enzymes were analyzed before and after the first treatment with each technique. The three methods did not differ for bilirubin lowering efficiency, with MARS showing only slightly less effective reductions. Finally, the three techniques did not differ in the amount of change of cholinesterase, but a lower reduction in AST was found using PAP. Our retrospective observation is one of the largest case series of hepatic failure treated with bilirubin absorption. The choice of the technique cannot be based on the desired reduction in bilirubin concentration. Based on costs and duration of treatment, we suggest that PAP could be considered as a first-line approach. In case of kidney involvement, MARS remains a valuable option.

Indexed as

AdultBilirubinBlood Component RemovalCreatinineFemaleHumansHyperbilirubinemiaMaleMiddle AgedPlasmapheresisRenal DialysisRetrospective StudiesSorption DetoxificationBilirubinCreatinineBilirubin adsorptionHyperbilirubinemiaLiver failureMolecular adsorbent recirculating systemPlasma adsorption perfusionPlasma exchange

Identifiers

PMID28887736
OpenAlexW2751215108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.