SynthesisClinical rheumatology2017
Meta-analysis: diagnostic accuracy of antibody against peptidylarginine deiminase 4 by ELISA for rheumatoid arthritis.
Synthesis in Clinical rheumatology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic value of longitudinal antinuclear antibody dynamics in rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Seronegative Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Distinct Immunopathological Entity with Erosive Potential.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Management and treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis, process and barriers among rheumatologists in Spain: a Delphi consensus.BMC rheumatology · 2025Article
- Precision Medicine in Rheumatology: The Role of Biomarkers in Diagnosis and Treatment Optimization.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Anti-Protein-Arginine Deiminase 4 IgG and IgA Delineate Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Autoantibodies in Rheumatoid Arthritis - Laboratory and Clinical Perspectives.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- Contribution of Multiplex Immunoassays to Rheumatoid Arthritis Management: From Biomarker Discovery to Personalized Medicine.Journal of personalized medicine · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The antibody against peptidylarginine deiminase (PAD) 4 is a biomarker that might be helpful in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We aim to estimate the diagnostic value of anti-PAD4 antibody for RA by meta-analysis. We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus for studies published in any languages in March 1, 2017 that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the anti-PAD4 antibody for the diagnosis of RA. The articles that detected the anti-PAD4 antibody by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and used healthy donors or patients without arthritis or arthralgia as controls were included for meta-analysis. The articles were assessed by Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. A bivariate mixed-effects model was used to summarize the diagnostic indexes from eight eligible studies. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios for anti-PAD4 antibody were 38% (95% CI 30.0-46.0%), 96% (95% CI 93.0-98.0%), 8.96 (95% CI 5.00-16.05), and 0.65 (95% CI 0.57-0.74), respectively. The summary diagnostic odds ratios were 13.74 (95% CI 7.23-26.09), and the area under the summary receiver operator characteristic curve was 86% (95% CI 83-89%). Anti-PAD4 antibody detected by ELISA shows a high value in the diagnosis of RA with high specificity, but relatively low sensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.