Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28887665›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2017

Impact of radiation technique, radiation fraction dose, and total cisplatin dose on hearing : Retrospective analysis of 29 medulloblastoma patients.

Sergiu Scobioala, Ross Parfitt, Peter Matulat, Christopher Kittel, Fatemeh Ebrahimi, Heidi Wolters, Antoinette Am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen, Hans Theodor Eich

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Challenges of Hearing Rehabilitation after Radiation and Chemotherapy.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2019
    Article
  13. Unilateral cochlea sparing in locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer: a planning study.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sergiu ScobioalaDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, University Hospital of Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Gebäude A1, 48149, Muenster, Germany. Sergiu.Scobioala@ukmuenster.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9622-3169
Ross ParfittDepartment of Phoniatrics and Pediatric Audiology, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Peter MatulatDepartment of Phoniatrics and Pediatric Audiology, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Christopher KittelDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, University Hospital of Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Gebäude A1, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
Fatemeh EbrahimiDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, University Hospital of Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Gebäude A1, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
Heidi WoltersDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, University Hospital of Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Gebäude A1, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
Antoinette Am Zehnhoff-DinnesenDepartment of Phoniatrics and Pediatric Audiology, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Hans Theodor EichDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, University Hospital of Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Gebäude A1, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
University Hospital Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo analyze the incidence and degree of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) resulting from different radiation techniques, fractionation dose, mean cochlear radiation dose (D MATERIAL AND

methodsIn all, 29 children with medulloblastoma (58 ears) with subclinical pretreatment hearing thresholds participated. Radiotherapy (RT) and cisplatin had been applied sequentially according to the HIT MED Guidance. Audiological outcomes up to the latest follow-up (median 2.6 years) were compared.

resultsBilateral high-frequency SNHL was observed in 26 patients (90%). No significant differences were found in mean hearing threshold between left and right ears at any frequency. A significantly better audiological outcome (p < 0.05) was found after tomotherapy at the 6 kHz bone-conduction threshold (BCT) and left-sided 8 kHz air-conduction threshold (ACT) than after a combined radiotherapy technique (CT). Fraction dose was not found to have any impact on the incidence, degree, and time-to-onset of SNHL. Patients treated with CT had a greater risk of SNHL at high frequencies than tomotherapy patients even though D

conclusionThe cochlear radiation dose should be kept as low as possible in patients who receive simultaneous cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The risk of clinically relevant HL was shown when D

Indexed as

Dose Fractionation, RadiationAdolescentAuditory ThresholdCerebellar NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyChildChild, PreschoolCisplatinCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHearing Loss, BilateralHearing Loss, SensorineuralHumansMaleMedulloblastomaRadiation InjuriesCisplatinBone conductionCochleaFraction doseHearing loss, sensorineuralRadiotherapy, intensity-modulated

Identifiers

PMID28887665
OpenAlexW2949609832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.