ArticleExperimental & applied acarology2017
Microbial diversity of the Tibetan tick Haemaphysalis tibetensis (Acari: Ixodidae).
Article in Experimental & applied acarology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Characterization of the bacterial community in Haemaphysalis longicornis (Acari: Ixodidae) throughout developmental stages.Experimental & applied acarology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Tibetan tick Haemaphysalis tibetensis is widely distributed in the Tibetan Plateau, and is recognized as one of the primary parasites affecting domestic and wild animals. No information is available on its microbial diversity. In the current study, the microbiomes in H. tibetensis were explored using Illumina MiSeq sequencing. Results indicate that a total of 28 phyla and 38 genera were characterized from this tick, and most of the microbes were classified in the phylum Proteobacteria. Female and male H. tibetensis harbored similar composition of the microbes, with dominant bacteria from the genus Coxiella accounting for 87.5 and 66.5% in females and males, respectively. The abundance of bacteria belonging to the genus Rickettsia in females and males was 6.9 and 23.7%, respectively. These findings may help understand the relationship between this tick and its symbiontic microorganisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28887650What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.