Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28887647›Full record

ArticleCurrent microbiology2018

A Comparative Evaluation Study of Growth Conditions for Culturing the Isolates of Campylobacter spp.

Ying-Hsin Hsieh, Steven Simpson, Khalil Kerdahi, Irshad M Sulaiman

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. When Disinfection Fails: Biocide Tolerance as a Driver ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Core Genome MLST for Source Attribution ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment forFood science of animal resources · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Multi-step optimization of the filtration method for the isolation of Campylobacter species from stool samples.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Article
  9. AFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ying-Hsin HsiehMicrobiological Sciences Branch, Southeast Food and Feed Laboratory, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 60 Eighth Street NE, Atlanta, GA, 30309, USA.
Steven SimpsonMicrobiological Sciences Branch, Southeast Food and Feed Laboratory, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 60 Eighth Street NE, Atlanta, GA, 30309, USA.
Khalil KerdahiMicrobiological Sciences Branch, Southeast Food and Feed Laboratory, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 60 Eighth Street NE, Atlanta, GA, 30309, USA.
Irshad M SulaimanMicrobiological Sciences Branch, Southeast Food and Feed Laboratory, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 60 Eighth Street NE, Atlanta, GA, 30309, USA. Irshad.Sulaiman@fda.hhs.gov.
United States Food and Drug Administration · US

Funding

FDA Commissioner's Fellowship Program FDA Commissioner's Fellowship Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Campylobacter is one of the leading causes of foodborne travelers' diarrhea worldwide. Although a large number cases of campylobacteriosis go undiagnosed or unreported, it is considered as the second most common foodborne illness in the USA affecting over 1.3 million individuals every year. Of various Campylobacter species, C. jejuni, C. coli, and C. lari have been accounted for causing more than 99% of human infections. Thus, there is a need to have efficient isolation method to protect public health on food safety and monitoring the burden of campylobacteriosis. Nevertheless, it is a challenging task as the exposure of environmental stress during isolation process makes Campylobacter species less culturable. Sixteen Campylobacter spp. were used to evaluate the current protocols used in Campylobacter isolation. For optimal recovery, a range of growth media (Bolton, Columbia, Muller Hinton, CVA Campy and mCCDA), incubation temperatures, and additional supplements (including antibiotics) were tested. Blood agars without antibiotics were sufficient for the initial recovery. Afterward, the isolates could grow on agars without any supplements, and in some cases growth was observed in the presence of antibiotics. Incubation at 37 °C was found to be the optimal temperature for the recovery and the growth of most species. Additionally, a food adulteration study was also carried out by artificially contaminating three food matrices that included egg, milk, and infant cereal, with two isolates of C. jejuni and C. coli. Results of this study should provide the insight for culturing and isolation of Campylobacter from food and other sources.

Indexed as

AnimalsCampylobacterCampylobacter InfectionsCattleCulture MediaEggsFood ContaminationHumansMilkCulture Media

Identifiers

PMID28887647
OpenAlexW2755044021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.