Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28887641›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2017

Interference effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over the right frontal cortex and adrenergic system on conditioned fear.

Mohammad Nasehi, Reyhaneh Soltanpour, Mohaddeseh Ebrahimi-Ghiri, Shahram Zarrabian, Mohammad-Reza Zarrindast

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Neuromodulation of Fear and Anxiety Circuits.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mohammad NasehiCognitive and Neuroscience Research Center (CNRC), Tehran Medical Sciences Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. Nasehi@iricss.org.
Reyhaneh SoltanpourDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Education, Islamic Azad University, Garmsar Branch, Tehran, Iran.
Mohaddeseh Ebrahimi-GhiriDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran.
Shahram ZarrabianCognitive and Neuroscience Research Center (CNRC), Tehran Medical Sciences Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad-Reza ZarrindastDepartment of Pharmacology School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box 13145-784, Tehran, Iran. zarinmr@ams.ac.ir.
Islamic Azad University Medical Branch of Tehran · IRIslamic Azad University of Garmsar · IRTehran University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity of Zanjan · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleThe effects of pharmacological interventions on fear memory have widely been studied, but there are very few studies about the effects of brain electrical stimulation on fear memory function.

objectiveTherefore, our aim was to determine whether anodal/cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the right frontal cortex would modify propranolol-induced contextual and auditory fear memory deficits, before or after training.

methodsThe adult NMRI male mice were randomly assigned into three groups: the sham group, the anodal tDCS group, and the cathodal tDCS group. Fear memories were evaluated using a classical fear conditioning apparatus.

resultsWhile the anodal stimulation did not affect fear retrieval, post-training cathodal stimulation improved fear memory retrieval. Regardless of when propranolol (0.1 mg/kg) was administered, it impaired fear memory retrieval. However, when anodal stimulation and propranolol were applied prior to the training, contextual fear memory retrieval was increased and auditory fear memory was reversed. An enhanced contextual retrieval was also observed when propranolol was administered prior to the training and stimulation occurred after the training. Only when the stimulation occurred prior to the training and propranolol was administered after the training was there a selective improvement in contextual fear memory retrieval, leaving the auditory fear memory retrieval impaired. Interestingly, cathodal stimulation improved the effects of propranolol on auditory fear memory only when it occurred prior to the training.

conclusionThe results highlight possible improving effects for anodal/cathodal tDCS on propranolol-induced deficits on fear memories. The timing of the interventions related to the specific phases of memory formation is important in modulating fear behaviors.

Indexed as

Transcranial Direct Current StimulationAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAnimalsConditioning, ClassicalFearFrontal LobeMaleMemoryMicePropranololAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsPropranololFear conditioningMicePropranololRight frontal cortexTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

Identifiers

PMID28887641
OpenAlexW2756441347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.