Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28887611›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2017

Toxicity, uptake, and accumulation of nano and bulk cerium oxide particles in Artemia salina.

Einstein Mariya David Sugantharaj David, Madhav Madurantakam Royam, Suresh Kumar Rajamani Sekar, Bhuvaneshwari Manivannan, Swathy Jalaja Soman, Amitava Mukherjee, Chandrasekaran Natarajan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Characterization and Expression of the Cytochrome P450 Genes inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Assembling p53 Activating Peptide With CeOFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Einstein Mariya David Sugantharaj DavidCentre for Nanobiotechnology, VIT University, Vellore, 632 014, India.
Madhav Madurantakam RoyamCentre for Nanobiotechnology, VIT University, Vellore, 632 014, India.
Suresh Kumar Rajamani SekarCentre for Nanobiotechnology, VIT University, Vellore, 632 014, India.
Bhuvaneshwari ManivannanCentre for Nanobiotechnology, VIT University, Vellore, 632 014, India.
Swathy Jalaja SomanCentre for Nanobiotechnology, VIT University, Vellore, 632 014, India.
Amitava MukherjeeCentre for Nanobiotechnology, VIT University, Vellore, 632 014, India.
Chandrasekaran NatarajanCentre for Nanobiotechnology, VIT University, Vellore, 632 014, India. nchandrasekaran@vit.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the toxicological impact of metal oxide nanoparticles has been studied for the last few decades on aquatic organisms, the exact mechanism of action is still unclear. The fate, behavior, and biological activity of nanoparticles are dependent on physicochemical factors like size, shape, surface area, and stability in the medium. This study deals with the effect of nano and bulk CeO

Indexed as

AnimalsArtemiaCeriumMetal NanoparticlesParticle SizeWater Pollutants, Chemicalceric oxideCeriumWater Pollutants, ChemicalAccumulationArtemia salinaDissolutionOxidative stressToxicityUptake

Identifiers

PMID28887611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.