Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28887521›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Sex differences in the C57BL/6 model of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection.

Jannike Dibbern, Lars Eggers, Bianca E Schneider

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jannike DibbernDivision of Coinfection, Priority Area Infections, Research Center Borstel, 23845, Borstel, Germany.
Lars EggersDivision of Coinfection, Priority Area Infections, Research Center Borstel, 23845, Borstel, Germany.
Bianca E SchneiderDivision of Coinfection, Priority Area Infections, Research Center Borstel, 23845, Borstel, Germany. bschneider@fz-borstel.de.
Research Center Borstel - Leibniz Lung Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally, tuberculosis (Tb) notification data show a male-to-female ratio of 1.7 and higher, but the underlying reasons for the male bias remain elusive. Despite the well-known gender bias in human pulmonary Tb, a majority of experimental animal studies either do not separate and analyze data by sex or do not report the sex of their subjects at all. In the present study, we report increased male susceptibility in one of the most commonly used mouse models for Tb, C57BL/6 mice. Our study revealed that disease progression upon aerosol infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) was accelerated in males resulting in increased morbidity and mortality compared to females. Elevated Mtb loads in males were associated with an early exaggerated pulmonary inflammatory response which likely was detrimental to the host, as reflected by exacerbated pathology and increased mortality. Our data emphasis the urgent need to include and separately analyze both sexes in future animal studies of Tb in order to appreciate the differences in immune responses and disease pathogenesis between males and females.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLResearch DesignSex FactorsTuberculosis, Pulmonary

Identifiers

PMID28887521
PMCPMC5591305
OpenAlexW2750933366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.