Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28887515›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2017

Sacral Neuromodulation for Refractory Bladder Pain Syndrome/Interstitial Cystitis: a Global Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Junpeng Wang, Yang Chen, Jiawei Chen, Guihao Zhang, Peng Wu

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06204874 (Evaluation of Pulsed Radiofrequency Ablation of the Superior Hypogastric Plexus for Treatment of Bladder Pain Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06204874 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Pulsed Radiofrequency Ablation of the Superior Hypogastric Plexus for Treatment of Bladder Pain Syndrome: A Case Series

TypeinterventionalSponsorWalter Reed National Military Medical CenterRan2024 to 2026Enrolled5ConditionsBladder Pain SyndromeArmsPulsed radiofrequency ablation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The pelvic floor: myth or hype?-a narrative review.Gynecology and pelvic medicine · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Junpeng WangDepartment of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China.
Yang ChenDepartment of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China.
Jiawei ChenDepartment of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China.
Guihao ZhangDepartment of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China.
Peng WuDepartment of Urology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China. doctorwupeng@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis (BPS/IC) is a common debilitating disease and there has not been consistently effective treatment. We aimed to evaluate all available literature regarding the efficacy and safety of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) for refractory BPS/IC. A comprehensive search of Pubmed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library through May 2016 was conducted. A total of 17 studies enrolling 583 patients were identified. Pooled analyses demonstrated that SNM was associated with great reduction in pelvic pain (weighted mean difference [WMD] -3.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] -5.22 to -2.76; p < 0.00001), Interstitial Cystitis Problem and Symptom Index scores (WMD -6.34; 95% CI -9.57 to -3.10; p = 0.0001; and WMD -7.17; 95% CI -9.90 to -4.45; p < 0.00001, respectively), daytime frequency (WMD -7.45; 95% CI -9.68 to -5.22; p < 0.00001), nocturia (WMD -3.01; 95% CI -3.56 to -2.45; p < 0.00001), voids per 24 hours (WMD -9.32; 95% CI -10.90 to -7.74; p < 0.00001) and urgency (WMD -1.08; 95% CI -1.79 to -0.37; p = 0.003) as well as significant improvement in average voided volume (WMD 95.16 ml; 95% CI 63.64 to 126.69; p < 0.0001). The pooled treatment success rate was 84% (95% CI 76% to 91%). SNM-related adverse events were minimal. Current evidence indicates that SNM might be effective and safe for treating refractory BPS/IC.

Indexed as

Cystitis, InterstitialDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansSpinal CordTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID28887515
PMCPMC5591255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.