Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28886943›Full record

ArticleVaccine2017

Short- and long-term protective efficacy against clade 2.3.4.4 H5N2 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus following prime-boost vaccination in turkeys.

Jefferson J S Santos, Adebimpe O Obadan, Stivalis Cardenas Garcia, Silvia Carnaccini, Darrell R Kapczynski, Mary Pantin-Jackwood, David L Suarez, Daniel R Perez

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jefferson J S SantosDepartment of Population Health, Poultry Diagnostic and Research Center, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Adebimpe O ObadanDepartment of Population Health, Poultry Diagnostic and Research Center, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Stivalis Cardenas GarciaDepartment of Population Health, Poultry Diagnostic and Research Center, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Silvia CarnacciniDepartment of Population Health, Poultry Diagnostic and Research Center, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Darrell R KapczynskiSoutheast Poultry Research Laboratory, USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Athens, GA, USA.
Mary Pantin-JackwoodSoutheast Poultry Research Laboratory, USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Athens, GA, USA.
David L SuarezSoutheast Poultry Research Laboratory, USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Athens, GA, USA.
Daniel R PerezDepartment of Population Health, Poultry Diagnostic and Research Center, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA. Electronic address: dperez1@uga.edu.
University of Georgia · USAgricultural Research Service · US

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201400008C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (HPAIV) infections are frequently associated with systemic disease and high mortality in domestic poultry, particularly in chickens and turkeys. Clade 2.3.4.4 represents a genetic cluster within the Asian HPAIV H5 Goose/Guangdong lineage that has transmitted through migratory birds and spread throughout the world. In 2014, clade 2.3.4.4 strains entered the U.S. via the Pacific flyway, reassorted with local strains of the North American lineage, and produced novel HPAIV strains of the H5N1, H5N2, and H5N8 subtypes. By 2015, the H5N2 HPAIVs disseminated eastwards within the continental U.S. and Canada and infected commercial poultry, causing the largest animal health outbreak in recent history in the U.S. The outbreak was controlled by traditional mass depopulation methods, but the outbreak was of such magnitude that it led to the consideration of alternative control measures, including vaccination. In this regard, little information is available on the long-term protection of turkeys vaccinated against avian influenza. In this report, a vaccination study was carried out in turkeys using 3 prime-boost approaches with a combination of 2 different vaccines, an alphavirus-based replicon vaccine and an adjuvanted-inactivated reverse genetics vaccine. Vaccine efficacy was assessed at 6 and 16weeks of age following challenge with a prototypic novel clade 2.3.4.4 H5N2 HPAIV. All three vaccines protocols were protective with significantly reduced virus shedding and mortality after challenge at 6weeks of age. In contrast, significant variations were seen in 16-week old turkeys after challenge: priming with the alphavirus-based replicon followed by boost with the adjuvanted-inactivated vaccine conferred the best protection, whereas the alphavirus-based replicon vaccine given twice provided the least protection. Our study highlights the importance of studying not only different vaccine platforms but also vaccination strategies to maximize protection against HPAIV especially with regards to the longevity of vaccine-induced immune response.

Indexed as

AnimalsCanadaDisease OutbreaksInfluenza A Virus, H5N1 SubtypeInfluenza A Virus, H5N2 SubtypeInfluenza in BirdsInfluenza VaccinesPoultryPoultry DiseasesTurkeysUnited StatesVaccinationVaccines, InactivatedVirus SheddingInfluenza VaccinesVaccines, InactivatedAvian influenzaChallengeClade 2.3.4.4Commercial poultryH5N2HPAIVLong-term protectionTurkeyVaccination

Identifiers

PMID28886943
PMCPMC5659307
OpenAlexW2751212699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.