ReviewDental clinics of North America2017
Biomaterials for Craniofacial Bone Regeneration.
Review in Dental clinics of North America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
64 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 152 citations in OpenAlex.
- The efficacy of Platelet and Leukocyte Rich Fibrin (L-PRF) in the healing process and bone repair in oral and maxillofacial surgeries: a systematic review.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Pooled it
- Clinical effect of vitamin C supplementation on bone healing: A systematic review.Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal · 2022Pooled it
- Trial
- Trial
- Artificial Intelligence and Digital Workflow in Craniofacial Bone Tissue Engineering: From Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) to Personalized Bioceramic Implants.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Review
- Subchondral Bone Regeneration of the Porcine Knee Joint Using α-TCP Biocement Enriched with Manuka Honey-Qualitative Pilot Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Activated Carbon Fiber Incorporated with Metal Ions: Characterization and Biological Interactions In Vitro.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Scaffolds and Stem Cells Show Promise for TMJ Regeneration: A Systematic Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Hyaluronic acid-coated Poly(L-lactide-co-1,3-trimethylene carbonate) modulate early cellular-scaffold interactions and osteogenic potential: a comprehensiveFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Microstructural characterization and osteogenic efficacy of PVA/PVP blended mineral scaffold for bone tissue engineering.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the osteogenic effect of Naringin-enhanced bmscs/cpc composite for alveolar ridge preservation and tooth extraction wound healing in beagle dogs.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Regenerative potential of biopolymers - calcium phosphate osteogenic composites in the healing of an experimental defect of the parietal bone.Biomaterials and biosystems · 2025Article
- Biomaterial-based strategies for bone cement: modulating the bone microenvironment and promoting regeneration.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Strategies for Craniofacial Tissue Engineering: Innovations for Scalable Bone Regeneration.Plastic and aesthetic research · 2025Article
- Stem Cells Within Three-Dimensional-Printed Scaffolds Facilitate Airway Mucosa and Bone Regeneration and Reconstruction of Maxillary Defects in Rabbits.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- [Clinical application of mineralized collagen scaffolds in surgical treatment of skull defects].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024Article
- Higher solubility and lower onset temperature of protein denaturation increase the osteoconductive capacity of collagen membranes: A preclinical in vivo study.Clinical oral implants research · 2024Article
- PLLA/GO Scaffolds Filled with Canine Placenta Hydrogel and Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Bone Repair in Goat Mandibles.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Article
- Influence of physicochemical characteristics of calcium phosphate-based biomaterials in cranio-maxillofacial bone regeneration. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of preclinical models.Materials today. Bio · 2024Article
4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Functional reconstruction of craniofacial defects is a major clinical challenge in craniofacial sciences. The advent of biomaterials is a potential alternative to standard autologous/allogenic grafting procedures to achieve clinically successful bone regeneration. This article discusses various classes of biomaterials currently used in craniofacial reconstruction. Also reviewed are clinical applications of biomaterials as delivery agents for sustained release of stem cells, genes, and growth factors. Recent promising advancements in 3D printing and bioprinting techniques that seem to be promising for future clinical treatments for craniofacial reconstruction are covered. Relevant topics in the bone regeneration literature exemplifying the potential of biomaterials to repair bone defects are highlighted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.