Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28886717›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of surgical oncology2017

The association between dietary protein intake and colorectal cancer risk: a meta-analysis.

Renxu Lai, Zhuang Bian, Hong Lin, Jiangnan Ren, Huaili Zhou, Huixue Guo

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of surgical oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Oxidative Stress, Nutrition and Cancer: Friends or Foes?The world journal of men's health · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Renxu LaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No.52, Meihua East Road, Zhuhai, Guangdong, 519000, China. lairenxu@126.com.
Zhuang BianDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No.52, Meihua East Road, Zhuhai, Guangdong, 519000, China.
Hong LinDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No.52, Meihua East Road, Zhuhai, Guangdong, 519000, China.
Jiangnan RenDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No.52, Meihua East Road, Zhuhai, Guangdong, 519000, China.
Huaili ZhouDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No.52, Meihua East Road, Zhuhai, Guangdong, 519000, China.
Huixue GuoDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No.52, Meihua East Road, Zhuhai, Guangdong, 519000, China.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNFifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssociation between dietary protein intake and colorectal cancer risk has not been fully quantified, while the results were controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the role of protein intake in the development of colorectal cancer.

methodsPUBMED and EMBASE were searched up to December 2016. Two independent reviewers independently extracted data from eligible studies. Relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was pooled using random-effects model to estimate the result. Besides, publication bias and sensitivity analysis were conducted.

resultsThirteen articles involving 21 studies comprising 8187 cases were included in this report. The pooled RR of colorectal cancer was 1.006 (95% CI = 0.857-1.179) indicating that there is no significant association between dietary protein intake and colorectal cancer risk. Furthermore, the pooled RRs for colon cancer and rectum cancer were 1.135(95% CI = 0.871-1.480) and 0.773(95% CI = 0.538-1.111), respectively, with the highest category of dietary protein intake. The association was not significant either in subgroup analysis of study design, protein type (animal protein or vegetable protein), sex, and or geographic locations.

conclusionsThe present study indicated that the highest category compared to the lowest category of protein intake had no significant association on colorectal cancer risk. Dose-response analysis was not conducted due to limited information provided. Therefore, more studies with large cases and participants as well as detailed amounts of dietary protein intake are wanted to confirm this result.

Indexed as

Dietary ProteinsFeeding BehaviorColonic NeoplasmsHumansIncidenceRectal NeoplasmsRisk FactorsDietary ProteinsColorectal cancerMeta-analysisProtein intakeRelative risk

Identifiers

PMID28886717
PMCPMC5591555
OpenAlexW2751587375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.