Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28886108›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

The potential role of genetic assimilation during maize domestication.

Anne Lorant, Sarah Pedersen, Irene Holst, Matthew B Hufford, Klaus Winter, Dolores Piperno, Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The sleeping crops of eastern North America: a new synthesis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Genomics of Long- and Short-Term Adaptation in Maize and Teosintes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anne LorantDept. of Plant Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5918-923X
Sarah PedersenDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States of America.
Irene HolstSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama, Republic of Panama.
Matthew B HuffordDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States of America.
Klaus WinterSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama, Republic of Panama.
Dolores PipernoSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama, Republic of Panama.
Jeffrey Ross-IbarraDept. of Plant Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, United States of America.
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute · PAIowa State University · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Domestication research has largely focused on identification of morphological and genetic differences between extant populations of crops and their wild relatives. Little attention has been paid to the potential effects of environment despite substantial known changes in climate from the time of domestication to modern day. In recent research, the exposure of teosinte (i.e., wild maize) to environments similar to the time of domestication, resulted in a plastic induction of domesticated phenotypes in teosinte. These results suggest that early agriculturalists may have selected for genetic mechanisms that cemented domestication phenotypes initially induced by a plastic response of teosinte to environment, a process known as genetic assimilation. To better understand this phenomenon and the potential role of environment in maize domestication, we examined differential gene expression in maize (Zea mays ssp. mays) and teosinte (Zea mays ssp. parviglumis) between past and present conditions. We identified a gene set of over 2000 loci showing a change in expression across environmental conditions in teosinte and invariance in maize. In fact, overall we observed both greater plasticity in gene expression and more substantial changes in co-expressionnal networks in teosinte across environments when compared to maize. While these results suggest genetic assimilation played at least some role in domestication, genes showing expression patterns consistent with assimilation are not significantly enriched for previously identified domestication candidates, indicating assimilation did not have a genome-wide effect.

Indexed as

DomesticationSelection, GeneticComputational BiologyCrops, AgriculturalEnvironmentGene Expression ProfilingGene OntologyZea mays

Identifiers

PMID28886108
PMCPMC5590903
OpenAlexW2949817817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.