ArticlePloS one2017
Optimisation of a machine learning algorithm in human locomotion using principal component and discriminant function analyses.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning Analysis for Quantitative Discrimination of Dried Blood Droplets.Scientific reports · 2020Trial
- Screening of Four Microbes for Solid-State Fermentation of Hawk Tea to Improve Its Flavor: Electronic Nose/GC-MS/GC-IMS-Guided Selection.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Exploring parameter optimisation in machine learning algorithms for locomotor task discrimination using wearable sensors.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Return-To-Sport Assessments After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Which Jump-Landing Test Is Sensitive to an ACL-Injury History Under Fatigued or NonFatigued Conditions?European journal of sport science · 2025Article
- Scoping Review of Machine Learning Techniques in Marker-Based Clinical Gait Analysis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Using Lower Limb Wearable Sensors to Identify Gait Modalities: A Machine-Learning-Based Approach.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Semi-Automatic Prostate Segmentation From Ultrasound Images Using Machine Learning and Principal Curve Based on Interpretable Mathematical Model Expression.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Automatic Classification of Barefoot and Shod Populations Based on the Foot Metrics and Plantar Pressure Patterns.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Assessment methods in human locomotion often involve the description of normalised graphical profiles and/or the extraction of discrete variables. Whilst useful, these approaches may not represent the full complexity of gait data. Multivariate statistical methods, such as Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Discriminant Function Analysis (DFA), have been adopted since they have the potential to overcome these data handling issues. The aim of the current study was to develop and optimise a specific machine learning algorithm for processing human locomotion data. Twenty participants ran at a self-selected speed across a 15m runway in barefoot and shod conditions. Ground reaction forces (BW) and kinematics were measured at 1000 Hz and 100 Hz, respectively from which joint angles (°), joint moments (N.m.kg-1) and joint powers (W.kg-1) for the hip, knee and ankle joints were calculated in all three anatomical planes. Using PCA and DFA, power spectra of the kinematic and kinetic variables were used as a training database for the development of a machine learning algorithm. All possible combinations of 10 out of 20 participants were explored to find the iteration of individuals that would optimise the machine learning algorithm. The results showed that the algorithm was able to successfully predict whether a participant ran shod or barefoot in 93.5% of cases. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to optimise the development of a machine learning algorithm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.