Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28886035›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Temporal causal inference with stochastic audiovisual sequences.

Shannon M Locke, Michael S Landy

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Causal inference accounts for heading perception in the presence of object motion.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shannon M LockeDept. of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, United States of America.
Michael S LandyDept. of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2079-4552

Funding

Vision Core Grant- Design and Fabrication ModuleP30EY013079 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI CARRASCO, MARISA · 2000 to 2025
$14.2M
SHAPE REPRESENTATION AND MULTIPLE DEPTH CUESR01EY008266 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI MICHAEL S LANDY · 1989 to 2026
$7.7M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY013079NEI NIH HHS R01 EY008266
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integration of sensory information across multiple senses is most likely to occur when signals are spatiotemporally coupled. Yet, recent research on audiovisual rate discrimination indicates that random sequences of light flashes and auditory clicks are integrated optimally regardless of temporal correlation. This may be due to 1) temporal averaging rendering temporal cues less effective; 2) difficulty extracting causal-inference cues from rapidly presented stimuli; or 3) task demands prompting integration without concern for the spatiotemporal relationship between the signals. We conducted a rate-discrimination task (Exp 1), using slower, more random sequences than previous studies, and a separate causal-judgement task (Exp 2). Unisensory and multisensory rate-discrimination thresholds were measured in Exp 1 to assess the effects of temporal correlation and spatial congruence on integration. The performance of most subjects was indistinguishable from optimal for spatiotemporally coupled stimuli, and generally sub-optimal in other conditions, suggesting observers used a multisensory mechanism that is sensitive to both temporal and spatial causal-inference cues. In Exp 2, subjects reported whether temporally uncorrelated (but spatially co-located) sequences were perceived as sharing a common source. A unified percept was affected by click-flash pattern similarity and the maximum temporal offset between individual clicks and flashes, but not on the proportion of synchronous click-flash pairs. A simulation analysis revealed that the stimulus-generation algorithms of previous studies is likely responsible for the observed integration of temporally independent sequences. By combining results from Exps 1 and 2, we found better rate-discrimination performance for sequences that are more likely to be integrated than those that are not. Our results support the principle that multisensory stimuli are optimally integrated when spatiotemporally coupled, and provide insight into the temporal features used for coupling in causal inference.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAcoustic StimulationAuditory PerceptionHumansPhotic StimulationVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID28886035
PMCPMC5590827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.