Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28885354›Full record

ArticleMedicine2017

Acute versus subacute community-acquired meningitis: Analysis of 611 patients.

Tarek Sulaiman, Lucrecia Salazar, Rodrigo Hasbun

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Rare case ofBMJ case reports · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. The Use of Adjunctive Steroids in Central Nervous Infections.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tarek SulaimanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, UT Health McGovern Medical School, TX, USA.
Lucrecia Salazar
Rodrigo Hasbun
Meningitis Now · GBThe University of Texas Health Science Center · US

Funding

Aseptic Meningoencephalitis Syndrome (AMS) In AdultsK23RR018929 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI HASBUN, RODRIGO · 2006 to 2010
$607k
NCRR NIH HHS K23 RR018929
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community-acquired meningitis can be classified into acute and subacute presentations by the duration of illness of ≤ or >5 days, respectively. There are currently no studies comparing the clinical features, management decisions, etiologies, and outcomes between acute and subacute presentations.It is a retrospective study of adults with community-acquired meningitis hospitalized in Houston, TX between January 2005 and January 2010. An adverse clinical outcome was defined as a Glasgow Outcome Scale score of ≤4.A total of 611 patients were identified, of which 458 (75%) were acute and 153 subacute (25%). The most common etiologies were unknown in 418 (68.4%), viral in 94 (15.4%), bacterial in 47 (7.7%), fungal in 42 patients (6.9%), and other noninfectious etiologies in 6 (1%). Patients with subacute meningitis were more likely to be immunosuppressed or have comorbidities, had fungal etiologies, and had higher rates of hypoglycorrachia and abnormal neurological findings (P <.05). Patients with an acute presentation were more likely to be treated empirically with intravenous antibiotics and had higher cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis and serum white blood cell counts (P <.05). On logistic regression, age >65 years and abnormal neurological findings were predictive of an adverse clinical outcome in both acute and subacute meningitis, whereas fever was also a significant prognostic factor in acute meningitis. (P <.05).Acute and subacute meningitis differ in regards to clinical presentations, etiologies, laboratory findings, and management decisions, but did not differ in rates of adverse clinical outcomes. Future studies including thoroughly investigated patients with new diagnostic molecular methods may show different results and outcomes.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCommunity-Acquired InfectionsFemaleGlasgow Outcome ScaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMeningitisMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTexasTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID28885354
PMCPMC6392806
OpenAlexW2750985229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.