Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28885348›Full record

Trial reportMedicine2017

Effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation therapy for the treatment of primary dysmenorrheal.

Hai-Yan Bai, Hong-Yan Bai, Zhi-Qin Yang

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05348005 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Study of the Use of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Unit in the Management of Endometriosis Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorMilton S. Hershey Medical CenterRan2022 to 2025Enrolled40ConditionsEndometriosis, Pelvic PainArmsOvira Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Unit
NCT06233786 phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of Non-invasive Neuromodulation in Primary Dysmenhorrea: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNaiara Benítez AramburuRan2024 to 2024Enrolled30ConditionsPrimary DysmenorrheaArmsTranscutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Analgesia by Sacral Surface Electrical Stimulation for Primary Dysmenorrhoea.Journal of rehabilitation medicine. Clinical communications · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hai-Yan BaiDepartment of Gynecology, The People's Hospital of Yan'an Department of Reproductive Medicine, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Yan'an Department of Chinese Medicine, The People's Hospital of Yan'an, Yan'an, China.
Hong-Yan Bai
Zhi-Qin Yang
Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Bao'an · CNYan'an University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to investigate the effect and safety of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) therapy for relieving pain in women with primary dysmenorrhea (PD).

methodsIn this study, 134 participants with PD were randomly divided into the intervention group and the sham group, with 67 participants in each group. Participants in the intervention group received TENS, whereas those in the sham group received sham TENS. The primary outcome was measured by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The secondary outcomes were measured by the duration of relief from dysmenorrheal pain, number of ibuprofen tablets taken, and the World Health Organization quality of life (WHOQOL)-BREF score, as well as the adverse events.

resultsA total of 122 participants completed the study. Compared to sham TENS, TENS showed a greater effect in pain relief with regard to the NRS (P < .01), duration of relief from dysmenorrheal pain (P < .01), and number of ibuprofen tablets taken (P < .01). However, no significant differences in the quality of life, measured by the WHOQOL-BREF score, were found between 2 groups. The adverse event profiles were also similar between 2 groups.

conclusionTENS was efficacious and safe in relieving pain in participants with PD.

Indexed as

Transcutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationAdultAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticDysmenorrheaFemaleHumansIbuprofenPain ManagementPain MeasurementQuality of LifeSingle-Blind MethodTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticIbuprofen

Identifiers

PMID28885348
PMCPMC6392990
OpenAlexW2752112875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.