Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28884749›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2018

Comprehensive clinical and molecular analyses of neuroendocrine carcinomas of the breast.

Marion Lavigne, Emmanuelle Menet, Jean-Christophe Tille, Marick Lae, Laetitia Fuhrmann, Claire Bonneau, Gabrielle Deniziaut, Samia Melaabi, Charlotte C K Ng, Caterina Marchiò and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Primary Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of Breast: Changing Paradigm.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the breast: a review of literature.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Marion LavignePathology-Genetics-Immunology Department, Institut Curie, Paris Sciences Lettres Research University, Paris, France.
Emmanuelle MenetInstitut Curie, Pathology-Genetics-Immunology, Versailles Saint Quentin University, Saint-Cloud, France.
Jean-Christophe TilleDivision of Clinical Pathology, Geneva University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Marick LaePathology-Genetics-Immunology Department, Institut Curie, Paris Sciences Lettres Research University, Paris, France.
Laetitia FuhrmannPathology-Genetics-Immunology Department, Institut Curie, Paris Sciences Lettres Research University, Paris, France.
Claire BonneauSurgery Department, Institut Curie, Versailles Saint Quentin University, Saint-Cloud, France.
Gabrielle DeniziautPathology-Genetics-Immunology Department, Institut Curie, Paris Sciences Lettres Research University, Paris, France.
Samia MelaabiPathology-Genetics-Immunology Department, Institut Curie, Paris Sciences Lettres Research University, Paris, France.
Charlotte C K NgDepartment of Biomedicine, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6100-0026
Caterina MarchiòDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Roman RouzierSurgery Department, Institut Curie, Versailles Saint Quentin University, Saint-Cloud, France.
Ivan BièchePathology-Genetics-Immunology Department, Institut Curie, Paris Sciences Lettres Research University, Paris, France.
Anne Vincent-SalomonPathology-Genetics-Immunology Department, Institut Curie, Paris Sciences Lettres Research University, Paris, France.
Université Paris Sciences et Lettres · FRInstitut Lavoisier de Versailles · FRInserm · FRUniversity Hospital of Basel · CHUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CHUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroendocrine breast carcinomas represent a rare subtype of breast cancer. Their definition, prevalence, and prognosis remain controversial in the literature. The 2012 WHO classification of breast cancer categorizes neuroendocrine carcinomas into three morphologically distinct subtypes: well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, and invasive breast carcinomas with neuroendocrine differentiation. We aimed to gain insight into the clinical, morphologic, phenotypic, and molecular features of 47 neuroendocrine breast carcinomas. Targeted next-generation sequencing by an AmpliSeq 22 cancer gene hotspot panel and the Prosigna assay were performed on 42/47 and 35/47 cases, respectively. Average age at diagnosis was 69 years. All tumors were estrogen receptor-positive and the large majority expressed progesterone receptor (89%), GATA3 (98%), FOXA1 (96%), and CK8/18 (98%). There was an almost equal distribution of luminal A (52%) and B (48%) carcinomas. Almost half of the cohort (49%) displayed a high risk of recurrence score with the Prosigna test. Patients with a neuroendocrine carcinoma had a shorter disease-free survival compared with those affected by carcinomas of no special type matched for age, size, grade, and estrogen receptor status. No significant differences were observed in terms of overall survival. Stratification of neuroendocrine carcinomas using the 2012 WHO criteria did not reveal statistically significant differences among the distinct categories (well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, and invasive breast carcinomas with neuroendocrine differentiation), in terms of either progression-free or overall survival. Our targeted sequencing analysis found three cases (7%) harboring a PIK3CA mutation, and in three other cases (7%) TP53 mutations were detected. This study showed that neuroendocrine breast carcinoma is a distinct subtype of luminal carcinoma with a low rate of PIK3CA mutations and with an aggressive clinical behavior. An accurate identification of neuroendocrine differentiation may be useful to better tailor patient adjuvant therapy within luminal carcinomas.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, NeuroendocrineDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedPrognosisProportional Hazards Models

Identifiers

PMID28884749
OpenAlexW2752597428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.