Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28884422›Full record

ArticleJournal of bone and mineral metabolism2018

Less strict intervention thresholds for the FRAX and TBS-adjusted FRAX predict clinical fractures in osteopenic postmenopausal women with no prior fractures.

Martin Kužma, Didier Hans, Tomáš Koller, Eva Némethová, Peter Jackuliak, Zdenko Killinger, Heinrich Resch, Juraj Payer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bone and mineral metabolism, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effects of Jintiange on the healing of osteoporotic fractures in aged rats.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Martin KužmaComenius University Faculty of Medicine, 5th Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Bratislava, Slovakia. kuzma@ru.unb.sk.
Didier HansCenter of Bone Diseases, Bone and Joint Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Tomáš KollerComenius University Faculty of Medicine, 5th Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Eva NémethováComenius University Faculty of Medicine, 5th Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Peter JackuliakComenius University Faculty of Medicine, 5th Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Zdenko KillingerComenius University Faculty of Medicine, 5th Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Heinrich ReschSt. Vincent Hospital Vienna, Academic Teaching Hospital of the Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Juraj PayerComenius University Faculty of Medicine, 5th Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Bratislava, Slovakia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about the clinical relevance of treating post-menopausal women with no prior history of fragility fracture and bone mineral densities (BMD) within the osteopenic range. In recent years, in addition to BMD and FRAX fracture probability assessments, a surrogate measure of bone micro-architecture quality, called the trabecular bone score (TBS), has been proven to predict future fragility fractures independently of both BMD and the FRAX. In this retrospective analysis of a follow-up study, we compared three risk assessment instruments-the FRAX, the TBS, and a TBS-adjusted FRAX score-in their ability, to predict future fragility fractures over a minimum of five years of follow-up among post-menopausal osteopenic women with no prior fragility fractures. We also sought to determine if more- versus less-stringent criteria were better when stratifying patients into higher-risk patients warranting osteoporosis-targeted intervention versus lower-risk patients in whom intervention would usually be deemed unnecessary. Over a mean 5.2 years follow-up, 18 clinical fragility fractures were documented among 127 women in the age 50 years and older (mean age = 66.1). On multivariate analysis utilizing regression models and Kaplan-Meier curve analysis, less-stringent criteria for the FRAX and TBS-adjusted FRAX were capable of predicting future fractures (with sensitivity/specificity of 83/31; 39/77 and 78/50% for TBS, FRAX and TBS-adjusted FRAX, respectively), while more-stringent criteria were incapable of doing so (with sensitivity/specificity of 56/60; 39/77 and 39/74 for TBS, FRAX and TBS-adjusted FRAX, respectively). Neither TBS threshold alone was a significant predictor of future fracture in our study. However, hazard ratio analysis revealed slight superiority of the TBS-adjusted FRAX over the FRAX alone (HR = 3.09 vs. 2.79). Adjusting the FRAX tool by incorporating the TBS may be useful to optimize the detection of post-menopausal osteopenic women with no prior fractures who warrant osteoporosis-targeted therapy.

Indexed as

Risk AssessmentAgedBone Diseases, MetabolicCancellous BoneFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFractures, BoneHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPostmenopauseProbabilityRetrospective StudiesFRAXTBS-adjusted FRAXThresholdsTrabecular bone score (TBS)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.