Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28884415›Full record

ArticlePituitary2017

Criteria for the definition of Pituitary Tumor Centers of Excellence (PTCOE): A Pituitary Society Statement.

Felipe F Casanueva, Ariel L Barkan, Michael Buchfelder, Anne Klibanski, Edward R Laws, Jay S Loeffler, Shlomo Melmed, Pietro Mortini, John Wass, Andrea Giustina and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pituitary, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 143 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
143citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
17.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

143 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 308 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Italian Guidelines for the Management of Prolactinomas.Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2023
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pituitary adenoma imaging as a determinant of acromegaly diagnosis and outcomes.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026
    Review
  12. What is the future of acromegaly therapy?The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026
    Review
  13. Genetics of familial acromegaly and pituitary gigantism.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

83 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Felipe F CasanuevaDivision of Endocrinology, Santiago de Compostela University, Santiago de Compostela, Spain. endocrine@usc.es.
Ariel L BarkanDivision of Endocrinology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Michael BuchfelderDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Anne KlibanskiNeuroendocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Edward R LawsDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Jay S LoefflerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Shlomo MelmedCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Pietro MortiniDepartment of Neurosurgery, San Raffaele University Health Institute Milan, Milan, Italy.
John WassOxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Andrea GiustinaDivision of Endocrinology, San Raffaele University Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Pituitary Society, Expert Group on Pituitary Tumors
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USChurchill Hospital · GBUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela · ESMassachusetts General Hospital · USSan Raffaele University of Rome · ITUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWith the goal of generate uniform criteria among centers dealing with pituitary tumors and to enhance patient care, the Pituitary Society decided to generate criteria for developing Pituitary Tumors Centers of Excellence (PTCOE).

methodsTo develop that task, a group of ten experts served as a Task Force and through two years of iterative work an initial draft was elaborated. This draft was discussed, modified and finally approved by the Board of Directors of the Pituitary Society. Such document was presented and debated at a specific session of the Congress of the Pituitary Society, Orlando 2017, and suggestions were incorporated. Finally the document was distributed to a large group of global experts that introduced further modifications with final endorsement.

resultsAfter five years of iterative work a document with the ideal criteria for a PTCOE is presented.

conclusionsAcknowledging that very few centers in the world, if any, likely fulfill the requirements here presented, the document may be a tool to guide improvements of care delivery to patients with pituitary disorders. All these criteria must be accommodated to the regulations and organization of Health of a given country.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansMalePituitary ACTH HypersecretionPituitary DiseasesPituitary GlandPituitary NeoplasmsSocieties, MedicalTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesAcromegalyCushing’s diseaseGonadotropinsPituitary radiotherapyThyrotropinomasTranssphenoidal surgery

Identifiers

PMID28884415
PMCPMC5606938
OpenAlexW2750649250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.