Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28884303›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2017

Efficacy and safety of clindamycin-based treatment for bone and joint infections: a cohort study.

J Courjon, E Demonchy, E Cua, E Bernard, P-M Roger

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Clindamycin Efficacy forAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J CourjonInfectious Diseases Department, Nice Academic Hospital, Hôpital Archet 1, Infectiologie 151, CHU de Nice, Route de St Antoine de Ginestière, 06200, Nice, France. courjon.j@chu-nice.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0445-5104
E DemonchyInfectious Diseases Department, Nice Academic Hospital, Hôpital Archet 1, Infectiologie 151, CHU de Nice, Route de St Antoine de Ginestière, 06200, Nice, France.
E CuaInfectious Diseases Department, Nice Academic Hospital, Hôpital Archet 1, Infectiologie 151, CHU de Nice, Route de St Antoine de Ginestière, 06200, Nice, France.
E BernardInfectious Diseases Department, Nice Academic Hospital, Hôpital Archet 1, Infectiologie 151, CHU de Nice, Route de St Antoine de Ginestière, 06200, Nice, France.
P-M RogerInfectious Diseases Department, Nice Academic Hospital, Hôpital Archet 1, Infectiologie 151, CHU de Nice, Route de St Antoine de Ginestière, 06200, Nice, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice · FRUniversité Côte d'Azur · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clindamycin has high bioavailability together with good diffusion in bone tissue and could represent an alternative antibiotic compound for the treatment of bone and joint infections (BJIs). However, data regarding the efficacy and safety of clindamycin for BJIs are limited. A monocentric cohort study based on our medical dashboard, which prospectively recorded 28 characteristics for all hospitalized patients since July 2005, was performed. BJIs were selected, and then, all mono-microbial BJI managed with clindamycin-based therapy were included. Remission was defined as the absence of clinical and/or microbiological relapse after treatment. The duration of follow-up without relapse was determined retrospectively using computerized medical records. For 10 years, 196 BJIs, of which 80 (41%) were device-associated infections, were treated with clindamycin-based therapy. The bacterial causative agent was Staphylococcus aureus in 130 cases (66%), coagulase-negative staphylococci in 29 cases (15%), streptococci in 31 cases (16%) and other bacteria in 6 cases (3%). When used in combination therapy, clindamycin was mainly paired with fluoroquinolones (31%) or rifampin (27%). The mean duration of clindamycin treatment was 7.4 ± 3.2 weeks (range, 1-24). An AE was recorded for 9 (4.5%) patients. Remission was recorded for 111 (57%) patients, with a mean duration of clinical follow-up of 28 ± 24 months. Treatment failure occurred in 22 (11%) patients, 50 patients (25%) were lost to follow-up, and 8 (4%) required long-term suppressive therapy. Among the assessable patients, clindamycin-based therapy was efficient in 111/133 cases (83%) and thus represents a reliable and safe alternative treatment option.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsAnti-Bacterial AgentsArthritis, InfectiousClindamycinCohort StudiesComorbidityDisease ManagementFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteitisTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsClindamycinBone and joint infectionsClindamycinEfficacyStaphylococcusStreptococcusTolerance

Identifiers

PMID28884303
OpenAlexW2755261410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.