Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28884243›Full record

ArticleJournal of community health2018

Smoking Policy Change Within Permanent Supportive Housing.

Anne Berit Petersen, Holly C Stewart, Jon Walters, Maya Vijayaraghavan

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. E-Cigarette Use among Current Smokers Experiencing Homelessness.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  6. Smoke-Free Home Intervention in Permanent Supportive Housing: A Multifaceted Intervention Pilot.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anne Berit PetersenSchool of Nursing, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Holly C StewartDepartment of Epidemiology, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Jon WaltersHousing Innovation Partners, San Diego, CA, USA.
Maya VijayaraghavanDivision of General Internal Medicine/Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 1001 Potrero Ave, Box 1364, San Francisco, CA, 94110, USA. Maya.Vijayaraghavan@ucsf.edu.

Funding

Postdoctoral training in tobacco controlT32CA113710 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LING, PAMELA MAY · 2016 to 2020
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA113710
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smoke-free policies effectively reduce secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure among non-smokers, and reduce consumption, encourage quit attempts, and minimize relapse to smoking among smokers. Such policies are uncommon in permanent supportive housing (PSH) for formerly homeless individuals. In this study, we collaborated with a PSH provider in San Diego, California to assess a smoke-free policy that restricted indoor smoking. Between August and November 2015, residents completed a pre-policy questionnaire on attitudes toward smoke-free policies and exposure to secondhand smoke, and then 7-9 months after policy implementation residents were re-surveyed. At follow-up, there was a 59.7% reduction in indoor smoking. The proportion of residents who identified as current smokers reduced by 13% (95% CI: -38, 10.2). The proportion of residents who reported never smelling SHS indoors (apartment 24.2%, 95% CI: 4.2, 44.1; shared areas 17.2%, 95% CI: 1.7, 32.7); in outdoor areas next to the living unit (porches or patio 56.7%, 95% CI: 40.7, 72.8); and in other outdoor areas (parking lot 28.6%, 95% CI: 8.3, 48.9) was lower post-policy compared with pre-policy. Overall, resident support increased by 18.7%; however, the greatest increase in support occurred among current smokers (from 14.8 to 37.5%). Fewer current smokers reported that the policy would enable cessation at post-policy compared to pre-policy. Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of implementing smoke-free policies in PSH for formerly homeless adults. However, policy alone appears insufficient to trigger change in smoking behavior, highlighting the need for additional cessation resources to facilitate quitting.

Indexed as

AdultCaliforniaCross-Sectional StudiesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMalePublic HousingSmoke-Free PolicySmokingTobacco Smoke PollutionTobacco Smoke Pollution

Identifiers

PMID28884243
PMCPMC5832576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.