Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28884230›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2017

Environmental impacts caused by cemeteries and crematoria, new funeral technologies, and preferences of the Northeastern and Southern Brazilian population as for the funeral process.

Nicholas Joseph Tavares da Cruz, Álvaro Guillermo Rojas Lezana, Paulo da Cruz Freire Dos Santos, Ibsen Mateus Bittencourt Santana Pinto, Claudio Zancan, Gustavo Henrique Silva de Souza

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Could Necroleachate Be the Cemetery's Sewage? A Panorama from Brazilian Legislation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicholas Joseph Tavares da CruzUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), Campus Universitário Reitor João David F. Lima, Trindade, Florianópolis, SC, 88040-900, Brazil. admnicholas@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0765-5424
Álvaro Guillermo Rojas LezanaUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), Campus Universitário Reitor João David F. Lima, Trindade, Florianópolis, SC, 88040-900, Brazil.
Paulo da Cruz Freire Dos SantosUniversidade Federal de Alagoas (UFAL), Avenida Lourival Melo Mota, s/n, Tabuleiro dos Martins, Maceió, AL, 57072-970, Brazil.
Ibsen Mateus Bittencourt Santana PintoUniversidade Federal de Alagoas (UFAL), Avenida Lourival Melo Mota, s/n, Tabuleiro dos Martins, Maceió, AL, 57072-970, Brazil.
Claudio ZancanUniversidade Federal de Alagoas (UFAL), Avenida Lourival Melo Mota, s/n, Tabuleiro dos Martins, Maceió, AL, 57072-970, Brazil.
Gustavo Henrique Silva de SouzaInstituto Federal do Norte de Minas Gerais (IFNMG), Rua Mocambi, 295, Bairro Viriato, Teófilo Otoni, MG, 39800-430, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cemeteries and crematoria are the main funeral ways used in the world nowadays. It is a little-studied segment in the present days, mainly as for the possible environmental impacts in the environment, such as those derived from dental amalgam, prostheses, and dioxins, among other. This article aimed to identify the environmental impacts caused by cemeteries and crematoria and to point out new trends in funeral processes such as freeze-drying and alkaline hydrolysis. The study is justified due to the large part of the Brazilian population that do not know the environmental impacts caused by cemeteries and crematoria, as well as to bring information about the new processes. For that, a research was carried out with 400 people. The main results show that among all the funeral processes, the new freeze-drying process was opted by 33% of the sample. We also identified that the main reasons for choosing the funeral process were less environmental impact (28%), no after-death expenses (grave payment) (16.1%), and the possibility of putting away or throwing away the remains wherever you want (14.9%). Finally, new funeral processes were well accepted by the Brazilian population-those who were interviewed-due to their benefits.

Indexed as

AttitudeCemeteriesCremationBrazilConsumer BehaviorAlkaline hydrolysisCemeteryCrematoriaEnvironmental impactsFreeze-drying

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.