Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28884113›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2017

Bidisha Pal, Bikul Das

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Advancing marine invertebrate cell line research: four key knowledge gaps.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. The Evolving Landscape of Potency Assays.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bidisha PalDepartment of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, The Forsyth InstituteCambridge, MA, United States.
Bikul DasDepartment of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, The Forsyth InstituteCambridge, MA, United States.
Biotech Park · INIndian Institute of Technology Guwahati · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) resides in their niches in close proximity to hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). These naïve MSCs have tremendous potential in regenerative therapeutics, and may also be exploited by cancer and infectious disease agents. Hence, it is important to study the physiological and pathological roles of naïve MSC. However, our knowledge of naïve MSCs is limited by lack of appropriate isolation and

Indexed as

Altruistic stem cells (ASCs)CD271+ BM-MSCsnaïve MSCs and in vitro primed MSCsself-renewalstem-cell based regenerative therapeuticsstemness

Identifiers

PMID28884113
PMCPMC5572382
OpenAlexW2747120528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.