Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28883970›Full record

ReviewTropical diseases, travel medicine and vaccines2016

The Pertussis resurgence: putting together the pieces of the puzzle.

Rotem Lapidot, Christopher J Gill

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tropical diseases, travel medicine and vaccines, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Toward a Controlled Human Infection Model of Pertussis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Multicenter Clinical Evaluation of the Automated AriesJournal of clinical microbiology · 2019
    Article
  19. Prevention of pertussis: An unresolved problem.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rotem LapidotDepartment of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA USA.
Christopher J GillDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA USA.
Boston Medical Center · USBoston University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pertussis incidence is rising in almost every country where acellular pertussis (aP) vaccines have been introduced, and is occurring across all age groups from infancy to adulthood. The key question is why? While several known factors such as waning of immunity, detection bias due to more sensitive tests and higher awareness of the disease among practitioners, and evolutionary shifts among

Indexed as

Acellular pertussis vaccineAsymptomatic transmissionEpidemiologic modelingPertussisPertussis vaccinesResurgenceReview

Identifiers

PMID28883970
PMCPMC5530967
OpenAlexW2563123075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.