Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28883701›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2017

Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition in the evaluation of lymph nodes enlargement in the absence of on-site pathologist.

Yung Ka Chin, Julio Iglesias-Garcia, Daniel de la Iglesia, Jose Lariño-Noia, Ihab Abdulkader-Nallib, Hector Lázare, Susana Rebolledo Olmedo, J Enrique Dominguez-Muñoz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yung Ka ChinDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Julio Iglesias-GarciaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Daniel de la IglesiaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Jose Lariño-NoiaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Ihab Abdulkader-NallibDepartment of Pathology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Hector LázareDepartment of Pathology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Susana Rebolledo OlmedoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
J Enrique Dominguez-MuñozDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate factors that influence the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition for lymph node enlargement in the absence of an on-site pathologist.

methodsA retrospective analysis of patients who underwent EUS-guided tissue acquisition for the pathological diagnosis of lymph node enlargement between April 2012 and June 2015 is reported. Tissue acquisition was performed with both cytology and biopsy needles of different calibers. The variables evaluated were lymph node location and size, number of passes and type of needle used. Final diagnosis was based on surgical histopathology or, in non-operated cases, on EUS-guided tissue acquisition and imaging assessment with a minimum clinical follow-up of 6 mo.

resultsDuring the study period, 168 lymph nodes with a median size of 20.3 mm (range 12.5-27) were sampled from 152 patients. Ninety lymph nodes (53.6%) were located at mediastinum, and 105 (62.5%) were acquired with biopsy needles. The final diagnosis was benign/reactive origin in 87 cases (51.8%), malignant in 65 cases (38.7%), and lymphoma in 16 cases (9.5%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for the detection of malignancy were 74.1%, 100%, 100% and 80.6%, respectively. The overall accuracy was 87.5% (95%CI: 81.7-91.7). No variables were independently associated with a correct final diagnosis according to the multivariate analysis.

conclusionEUS-guided tissue acquisition is a highly accurate technique for assessing lymph node enlargement. None of the variables evaluated were associated with diagnostic accuracy.

Indexed as

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle AspirationAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesLymphomaMaleMediastinumMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityAccuracyEndoscopic ultrasoundFine-needle aspirationFine-needle biopsyLymph node

Identifiers

PMID28883701
PMCPMC5569290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.