ArticleScientific reports2017
An algorithm based on positive and negative links for community detection in signed networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deriving functional network topology frombioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Unpacking polarization: Antagonism and alignment in signed networks of online interaction.PNAS nexus · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Community detection problem in networks has received a great deal of attention during the past decade. Most of community detection algorithms took into account only positive links, but they are not suitable for signed networks. In our work, we propose an algorithm based on random walks for community detection in signed networks. Firstly, the local maximum degree node which has a larger degree compared with its neighbors is identified, and the initial communities are detected based on local maximum degree nodes. Then, we calculate a probability for the node to be attracted into a community by positive links based on random walks, as well as a probability for the node to be away from the community on the basis of negative links. If the former probability is larger than the latter, then it is added into a community; otherwise, the node could not be added into any current communities, and a new initial community may be identified. Finally, we use the community optimization method to merge similar communities. The proposed algorithm makes full use of both positive and negative links to enhance its performance. Experimental results on both synthetic and real-world signed networks demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.