ArticleScientific reports2017
The utility of mtDNA and rDNA for barcoding and phylogeny of plant-parasitic nematodes from Longidoridae (Nematoda, Enoplea).
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Resolving species boundaries in Mediterranean Xiphinema (Nematoda: Longidoridae) through multivariate morphometrics and multilocus profiling: four new species and two cryptic complexes.Zoological letters · 2026Article
- First report of the complete mitochondrial genome of anInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2026Article
- Systematic revision of Paralongidorus (Nematoda: Longidoridae) based on molecular and morphological evidence, with the description of a new species from Spain.Zoological letters · 2026Article
- Description of A New Cryptic Species of the Papillosa Group,Journal of nematology · 2025Article
- Two New Reported Species ofJournal of nematology · 2025Article
- Detection Methods for Pine Wilt Disease: A Comprehensive Review.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Current advances in the identification of plant nematode diseases: From lab assays to in-field diagnostics.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- Population Genetic Structure ofInsects · 2022Article
- First Report ofJournal of nematology · 2022Article
- Ecological and Morphological Differentiation Among COI Haplotype Groups in the Plant Parasitic Nematode SpeciesJournal of nematology · 2022Article
- Remarkable Cryptic Diversity ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- Morphological and molecular characterisation ofJournal of nematology · 2021Article
- Morphostatic Speciation within the Dagger NematodePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Article
- Molecular and morphological characterisation ofZooKeys · 2019Article
- Article
- Article
- Description ofJournal of nematology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The traditional identification of plant-parasitic nematode species by morphology and morphometric studies is very difficult because of high morphological variability that can lead to considerable overlap of many characteristics and their ambiguous interpretation. For this reason, it is essential to implement approaches to ensure accurate species identification. DNA barcoding aids in identification and advances species discovery. This study sought to unravel the use of the mitochondrial marker cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (coxI) as barcode for Longidoridae species identification, and as a phylogenetic marker. The results showed that mitochondrial and ribosomal markers could be used as barcoding markers, except for some species from the Xiphinema americanum group. The ITS1 region showed a promising role in barcoding for species identification because of the clear molecular variability among species. Some species presented important molecular variability in coxI. The analysis of the newly provided sequences and the sequences deposited in GenBank showed plausible misidentifications, and the use of voucher species and topotype specimens is a priority for this group of nematodes. The use of coxI and D2 and D3 expansion segments of the 28S rRNA gene did not clarify the phylogeny at the genus level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.