ArticleBritish dental journal2017
Effect of a hyperbaric environment (diving conditions) on adhesive restorations: an in vitro study.
Article in British dental journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dental Barotrauma and Pressure-Related Dental Pain Among Civilian Scuba Divers in Dakar, Senegal: A Cross-Sectional Study.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2026Article
- Do Different Durations of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Affect the Microleakage of Bulk-Fill Composites?Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Influence of atmospheric pressure changes on dentin bond strength of conventional, bulk-fill and single-shade resin composites.Diving and hyperbaric medicine · 2022Article
- Bibliometric Analysis of Literature Published on Antibacterial Dental Adhesive from 1996-2020.Polymers · 2020Review
- Plumbing the depths of barodontalgia.British dental journal · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives No recent study has addressed the effect of diving conditions (pressure increase) on adhesive restorations. We evaluated the impact of a simulated hyperbaric environment on microleakage of the dentine-composite resin interface. The ultimate aim was to propose recommendations for restorative dentistry for patients who are divers to limit barodontalgia (dental pain caused by pressure variations of the environment) and may lead to dangerous sequelae.Methods We bonded 20 dentine disks by using an adhesive system (Scothbond Universal) to ten intact composite cylinders and ten composite cylinders with porosity (Ceram X mono). For each group, the samples were divided into two subgroups, one submitted to a simulated hyperbaric environment and the other to an ambient environment. All samples were immersed in a silver nitrate solution to evaluate microleakage at the interface after analysis with a camera.Results Dye percolation for groups in the hyperbaric environment was greater than groups in ambient environment. For each subgroup, dye percolation was greater for samples with than without porosity.Conclusions High percolation percentages demonstrate that our simulated hyperbaric condition led to loss of sealing at the dentine-composite resin interface, especially with porous composites.Clinical significance Respect of the protocol and the quality of condensation for adhesive restorations are important in all clinical situations, especially for patients who are divers. A more interventionist approach must be adopted with these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28883605What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.